ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2013
Application of five prognostic survival scores to primary myelofibrosis in 62 Brazilian patients.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline on myeloproliferative neoplasms: Associacão Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Cellular: Project guidelines: Associação Médica Brasileira - 2019.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary myelofibrosis (PM) is a Philadelphia-negative clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder characterized by intense reactive changes of bone marrow stroma with collagen fibrosis, osteosclerosis and angiogenesis. PM usually affects elderly people, and approximately half of the patients present JAK2V617F mutation. PM clinical course varies from 1 to 30 years, evolving from asymptomatic into progressive bone marrow failure, symptomatic splenomegaly or acute leukemia in 10-20 % of cases. PM risk stratification is based on parameters predicting survival, and several attempts have been made to identify clinical and laboratory features that could predict PM patient survival. This study applied five prognostic scores: Dupriez, Cervantes, Mayo, IPSS and DIPSS-Plus in 62 Brazilians patients from three centers, and compared their relevance and clinical usefulness considering the scores' parameters, fibrosis, JAK2V617F mutation, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly and treatment. According to the Cervantes, Dupriez and Mayo scores, most patients were stratified into low-risk group. However, when IPSS and DIPSS-Plus were applied, most patients were classified into an intermediate range, being low risk in only 11 and 13 % of patients, respectively. Overall survival at 4 years was 84 %. The Cervantes score was the only one that remained significantly associated with survival in a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the Cervantes score remains important to the prognostication of PM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.