ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2014
Impact of fungal load on diagnosis and outcome of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A study on the fungal rhinosinusitis: Causative agents, symptoms, and predisposing factors.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023Article
- Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis accompanied by allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: A case report and literature review.World journal of clinical cases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungal load colonization may modify the classic eosinophilic inflammation in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). We aimed to evaluate the impact of fungal load on diagnosis and outcome of AFRS. In the present cohort study fungal load differences were determined prospectively according to Gomori methenamine silver (GMS) fungal stained (histopathological and cytological examination) with the tenacious mucus, cheesy clay-like materials and sinus mucosa/polyps in 12 AFRS patients. Two groups with different fungal loads, AFRS with (six patients) and without (six patients) high fungal loads (HFL) were evaluated for nasal endoscopic score, paranasal sinuses CT score, histopathological and immunohistochemical changes. Endoscopic outcome scoring differences were evaluated for 1 year after endoscopic sinus surgery and 1 month oral corticosteroids treatment. No differences were observed between both groups (AFRS with/without HFL) concerning the total CT score and opacification features (P > 0.05). Eosinophils and CD3 + CD8 + T cell were dominant in both groups. More edema and less fibrosis were observed in HFL group. Gliotoxin producers Aspergilli were present in all HFL in comparison to 5/6 (83.3%) in cases without HFL. Fewer patients 1/6 (16.6%) and less number of recurrences/year 0.1 ± 0.4 occurred in the AFRS with HFL compared to the AFRS without HFL [5/6 (83.3%) and 1.16 ± 0.7) (P = 0.021 and 0.023, respectively]. In addition to mucus and mucosal tissues, cheesy clay-like materials must be assessed in AFRS cases. Although patients of AFRS with HFL had negligible clinical differences from ordinary AFRS without HFL, they had better outcome after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.