Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23567806›Full record

ArticleLife sciences2013

Establishing a model for assessing DNA damage in murine brain cells as a molecular marker of chemotherapy-associated cognitive impairment.

Evgeny Krynetskiy, Natalia Krynetskaia, Diana Rihawi, Katarzyna Wieczerzak, Victoria Ciummo, Ellen Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Novel Techniques for Mapping DNA Damage and Repair in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Elevated Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage in Cortical Neurons of Chemotherapy Patients.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2021
    Article
  5. Cognitive Effects of Cancer and Cancer Treatments.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2018
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Serotonin, neural markers, and memory.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evgeny KrynetskiyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States.
Natalia Krynetskaia
Diana Rihawi
Katarzyna Wieczerzak
Victoria Ciummo
Ellen Walker

Funding

Effects of chemotherapeutic agents on learning and memory in miceR01CA129092 · NCI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI WALKER, ELLEN ANN · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA129092NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsChemotherapy-associated cognitive impairment often follows cancer chemotherapy. We explored chemotherapy-induced DNA damage in the brain cells of mice treated with 5-fluorouracil (5FU), an antineoplastic agent, to correlate the extent of DNA damage to behavioral functioning in an autoshaping-operant mouse model of chemotherapy-induced learning and memory deficits (Foley et al., 2008). MAIN

methodsMale, Swiss-Webster mice were injected once with saline or 75 mg/kg 5FU at 0, 12, and 24h and weighed every 24h. Twenty-four h after the last injection, the mice were tested in a two-day acquisition and the retention of a novel response task for food reinforcement. Murine brain cells were analyzed for the presence of single- and double-strand DNA breaks by the single cell gel electrophoresis assay (the Comet assay). KEY

findingsWe detected significant differences (p<0.0001) for all DNA damage characteristics (DNA "comet" tail shape, migration pattern, tail moment and olive moments) between control mice cohort and 5FU-treated mice cohort: tail length - 119 vs. 153; tail moment - 101 vs. 136; olive moment - 60 vs. 82, correspondingly. We found a positive correlation between increased response rates (r=0.52, p<0.05) and increased rate of errors (r=0.51, p<0.05), and DNA damage on day 1. For all 15 mice (saline-treated and 5FU-treated mice), we found negative correlations between DNA damage and weight (r=-0.75, p<0.02). SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicate that chemotherapy-induced DNA damage changes the physiological status of the brain cells and may provide insights to the mechanisms for cognitive impairment after cancer chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, PharmacologicalModels, AnimalAnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBrainCells, CulturedConditioning, OperantDNA DamageFluorouracilMaleMiceNeuronsReinforcement ScheduleAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, PharmacologicalFluorouracil5-FluorouracilAcquisitionAutoshapingChemotherapyCognitionDNA damage

Identifiers

PMID23567806
PMCPMC3748161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.