Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23567655›Full record

Trial reportProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2013

Statin use and risk of prostate cancer and high-grade prostate cancer: results from the REDUCE study.

S J Freedland, R J Hamilton, L Gerber, L L Banez, D M Moreira, G L Andriole, R S Rittmaster

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Obesity increases the risk for high-grade prostate cancer: results from the REDUCE study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  10. Smoking and risk of low- and high-grade prostate cancer: results from the REDUCE study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014
    Trial
  11. Prostate Cancer and the Mevalonate Pathway.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Statins in risk-reduction and treatment of cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2020
    Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

S J FreedlandSurgery Section, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. Steve.freedland@duke.edu
R J Hamilton
L Gerber
L L Banez
D M Moreira
G L Andriole
R S Rittmaster
Durham VA Medical Center · USDuke University · USTriangle · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatins are associated with lower PSA levels. As PSA is the primary method for prostate cancer (PC) screening, this confounds any associations between statins and risk of being diagnosed with PC. Thus, we examined the association between statins and cancer and high-grade cancer in REDUCE, where biopsies were largely PSA-independent.

methodsPost-hoc secondary analysis of REDUCE, which was a prospective multinational randomized controlled trial of dutasteride vs placebo for 4 years among men aged 50-75 years with PSA of 2.5-10.0  ng  ml(-1) and a negative biopsy at baseline, and included PSA-independent biopsies mandated at 2- and 4-years. Analyses were limited to men who underwent at least one biopsy while under study (n=6729). The association between baseline statin use and risk of overall, high-grade (Gleason ≥ 7) or low-grade (Gleason ≤ 6) PC vs no cancer was examined using multinomial logistic regression adjusting for age, race, baseline PSA, prostate volume, rectal examination findings, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, smoking, alcohol intake and treatment arm.

resultsOf 6729 men who had at least one biopsy while on study, 1174 (17.5%) were taking a statin at baseline. Men taking statins were older, had lower PSA levels, higher BMI values and lower serum testosterone and dihydrotestosterone levels, though differences, were slight. Statin use was not associated with overall PC diagnosis (multivariable OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.89-1.24, P=0.54). When stratified by grade, statin use was not associated with low-grade (multivariable OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85-1.25, P=0.75) or high-grade cancer (multivariable OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.85-1.45, P=0.46). The major limitation is the inclusion of only men with a negative baseline biopsy.

conclusionsAmong men with a negative baseline biopsy and follow-up biopsies largely independent of PSA, statins were not associated with cancer or high-grade cancer.

Indexed as

AzasteroidsBiopsyDouble-Blind MethodDutasterideEarly Detection of CancerHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsKallikreinsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRiskUnited StatesAzasteroidsDutasterideHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID23567655
OpenAlexW2044993678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.