Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23567000›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2013

An apparatus to quantify anteroposterior and mediolateral shear reduction in shoe insoles.

Barry Belmont, Yancheng Wang, Peethambaran Ammanath, James S Wrobel, Albert Shih

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01844479 (Multi-material, Layer, and Density Insoles for a Patient-specific Approach to Shear and Pressure Reduction in the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes-related Foot Ulcer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01844479 nacompletednot on this map

Multi-material, Layer, and Density Insoles for a Patient-specific Approach to Shear and Pressure Reduction in the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes-related Foot Ulcer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2012 to 2014Enrolled27ConditionsDiabetic Foot Ulcer, Diabetic FootArmsdiabetic foot orthotic, Standard innersole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barry BelmontUniversity of Michigan, 2350 Hayward St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. belmont@umich.edu
Yancheng Wang
Peethambaran Ammanath
James S Wrobel
Albert Shih

Funding

PUBLIC HEALTH DEMONSTRATIONP60DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MYERS, MARTIN G · 1985 to 2012
$26.5M
Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS 5P600-DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany of the physiological changes that lead to diabetic foot ulceration, such as muscle atrophy and skin hardening, are manifested at the foot-ground interface via pressure and shear points. Novel shear-reducing insoles have been developed, but their magnitude of shear stiffness has not yet been compared with regular insoles. The aim of this study was to develop an apparatus that would apply shear force and displacement to an insole's forefoot region, reliably measure deformation, and calculate insole shear stiffness.

methodsAn apparatus consisting of suspended weights was designed to test the forefoot region of insoles. Three separate regions representing the hallux; the first and second metatarsals; and the third, fourth, and fifth metatarsals were sheared at 20 mm/min for displacements from 0.1 to 1.0 mm in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions for two types of insoles (regular and shear reducing).

resultsShear reduction was found to be significant for the intervention insoles under all testing conditions. The ratio of a regular insole's effective stiffness and the experimental insole's effective stiffness across forefoot position versus shear direction, gait instance versus shear direction, and forefoot position versus gait instance was 270% ± 79%, 270% ± 96%, and 270% ± 86%, respectively. The apparatus was reliable with an average measured coefficient of variation of 0.034 and 0.069 for the regular and shear-reducing insole, respectively.

conclusionAn apparatus consisting of suspended weights resting atop three locations of interest sheared across an insole was demonstrated to be capable of measuring the insole shear stiffness accurately, thus quantifying shear-reducing effects of a new type of insole.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesPressureShear StrengthShoesDiabetic FootEquipment Failure AnalysisForefoot, HumanGaitHumansStress, MechanicalWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

PMID23567000
PMCPMC3737643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.