Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23566774›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2013

Modeling longitudinal drinking data in clinical trials: an application to the COMBINE study.

Stacia M DeSantis, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Nathaniel L Baker, Patrick K Randall, Raymond F Anton, James J Prisciandaro

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal data on abstinence, frequency and intensity of drinking in alcoholism trials.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2018
    Article
  3. Models for analyzing zero-inflated and overdispersed count data: an application to cigarette and marijuana use.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Article
  4. Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons meta-analysis for correlated outcomes subject to reporting bias.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stacia M DeSantisUniversity of Texas Health Sciences Center, 1200 Herman Pressler Dr, Houston, TX 77030, United States. stacia.m.desantis@uth.tmc.edu
Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Nathaniel L Baker
Patrick K Randall
Raymond F Anton
James J Prisciandaro
Medical University of South Carolina · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Career Development and Mentoring in Clinical/Translational Alcohol ResearchK05AA017435 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ANTON, RAYMOND F · 2008 to 2017
$2.2M
Neuroimaging mechanisms of overlap between alcoholism and bipolar disorderK23AA020842 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PRISCIANDARO, JAMES JOSEPH · 2012 to 2016
$835k
Robust Transition Models for the Analysis of Longitudinal Drinking OutcomesR03AA020648 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BANDYOPADHYAY, DIPANKAR, DESANTIS, STACIA · 2011 to 2012
$160k
NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA017435NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA020842NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA020648NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA020648-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of consensus in the literature as to how to define drinking outcomes in clinical trials. Typically, separate statistical models are fit to assess treatment effects on several summary drinking measures. These summary measures do not capture the complexity of drinking behavior. We used the COMBINE study to illustrate a statistical approach for examining treatment effects on high-resolution drinking data.

methodsThis is a secondary data analysis of COMBINE participants randomly assigned to naltrexone, acamprosate, with medical management and/or combined behavioral intervention (CBI). Using a Poisson hurdle model, abstinence and number of drinks were simultaneously modeled as a function of treatment and covariates. An emphasis was placed on the evaluation of "risky drinking" (3 drinks/day for women and 4 for men).

resultsDuring treatment, naltrexone increased the odds of abstinence vs placebo naltrexone (OR=1.35 [1.06, 1.65]) but receiving CBI in addition to naltrexone (vs not) obscured this effect; thus, the naltrexone effect was largest in the group not receiving CBI (OR=1.87 [1.29, 2.46]). Naltrexone vs placebo naltrexone also reduced the risk of drinking in those who resumed risky drinking (RR=0.58 [0.24, 0.93]) and increased the odds of maintaining low risk drinking (OT=1.99 [1.07, 2.90]). Both effects were strongest in the absence of CBI when only "medical management" was provided.

conclusionsThe hurdle model is an appropriate statistical tool for assessing the effect of treatment on the two part drinking process, abstinence and number of drinks. When applied to COMBINE, results bolster the use of naltrexone in promoting abstinence and reduction in risky drinking.

Indexed as

AcamprosateAdultAlcohol DeterrentsAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismCognitive Behavioral TherapyCombined Modality TherapyData Interpretation, StatisticalDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleModels, StatisticalNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsAcamprosateAlcohol DeterrentsNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsTaurineAcamprosateAlcoholismClinical trialCognitive behavioral interventionNaltrexonePoisson hurdle modelZero inflation

Identifiers

PMID23566774
PMCPMC4025907
OpenAlexW2041168842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.