Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23566564›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2013

CoreGenes3.5: a webserver for the determination of core genes from sets of viral and small bacterial genomes.

Dann Turner, Darren Reynolds, Donald Seto, Padmanabhan Mahadevan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Isolation and characterization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bacteriophage Taxonomy: A Continually Evolving Discipline.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genomic Profiling of Non-O157 Shiga ToxigenicPHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of a phage cocktail targetingFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dann TurnerCentre for Research in Biosciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.
Darren Reynolds
Donald Seto
Padmanabhan Mahadevan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoreGenes3.5 is a webserver that determines sets of core genes from viral and small bacterial genomes as an automated batch process. Previous versions of CoreGenes have been used to classify bacteriophage genomes and mine data from pathogen genomes.

findingsCoreGenes3.5 accepts as input GenBank accession numbers of genomes and performs iterative BLASTP analyses to output a set of core genes. After completion of the program run, the results can be either displayed in a new window for one pair of reference and query genomes or emailed to the user for multiple pairs of small genomes in tabular format.

conclusionsWith the number of genomes sequenced increasing daily and interest in determining phylogenetic relationships, CoreGenes3.5 provides a user-friendly web interface for wet-bench biologists to process multiple small genomes for core gene determinations. CoreGenes3.5 is available at http://binf.gmu.edu:8080/CoreGenes3.5.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenome, ViralAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticData MiningGenomicsInternetPhylogenySoftware

Identifiers

PMID23566564
PMCPMC3630060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.