Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23566308›Full record

Trial reportNeurogastroenterology and motility2013

Differences in brain responses between lean and obese women to a sweetened drink.

L Connolly, K Coveleskie, L A Kilpatrick, J S Labus, B Ebrat, J Stains, Z Jiang, K Tillisch, H E Raybould, E A Mayer

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Humans with obesity have disordered brain responses to food images during physiological hyperglycemia.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2018
    Trial
  7. Running Performance With Nutritive and Nonnutritive Sweetened Mouth Rinses.International journal of sports physiology and performance · 2017
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Food cue reactivity: Neurobiological and behavioral underpinnings.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L ConnollyOppenheimer Family Center for Neurobiology of Stress, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7378, USA. emayer@ucla.edu
K Coveleskie
L A Kilpatrick
J S Labus
B Ebrat
J Stains
Z Jiang
K Tillisch
H E Raybould
E A Mayer
Center for Neurologic Study · USNational Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK041301 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JENSEN, DENNIS MICHAEL · 1990 to 2019
$18.0M
Women's Health and Functional Visceral Disorders CenterP50DK064539 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAYER, EMERAN A · 2002 to 2017
$17.5M
PERCEPTION AND MODULATION OF VISCERAL SENSATIONSR01DK048351 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAYER, EMERAN A · 1996 to 2019
$8.2M
Mind/Brain/Body Interactions in Stress-Related DisordersR24AT002681 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAYER, EMERAN A · 2004 to 2008
$4.6M
Effective connectivity of central response to Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)K08DK071626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LABUS, JENNIFER S · 2006 to 2010
$607k
NCCIH NIH HHS R24 AT002681NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK071626NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK041301NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK041301NIDDK NIH HHS P50 DK064539NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK048351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIngestion of sweet food is driven by central reward circuits and restrained by endocrine and neurocrine satiety signals. The specific influence of sucrose intake on central affective and reward circuitry and alterations of these mechanisms in the obese are incompletely understood. For this, we hypothesized that (i) similar brain regions are engaged by the stimulation of sweet taste receptors by sucrose and by non-nutrient sweeteners and (ii) during visual food-related cues, obese subjects show greater brain responses to sucrose compared with lean controls.

methodsIn a double-blind, crossover design, 10 obese and 10 lean healthy females received a sucrose or a non-nutrient sweetened beverage prior to viewing food or neutral images. BOLD signal was measured using a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. KEY

resultsViewing food images after ingestion of either drink was associated with engagement of similar brain regions (amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, anterior insula). Obese differed from lean subjects in behavioral and brain responses rating both beverages as less tasteful and satisfying, yet demonstrating greater brain responses. Obese subjects also showed engagement of an additional brain network (including anterior insula, anterior cingulate, hippocampus, and amygdala) only after sucrose ingestion. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Obese subjects had a reduced behavioral hedonic response, yet a greater engagement of affective brain networks, particularly after sucrose ingestion, suggesting that in obese subjects, lingual and gut-derived signaling generate less central hedonic effects than food-related memories in response to visual cues, analogous to response patterns implicated in food addiction.

Indexed as

BeveragesSweetening AgentsAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFood PreferencesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingObesityYoung AdultSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID23566308
PMCPMC4114731
OpenAlexW2050085989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.