ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2013
Probing mercury(II)-DNA interactions by nanopore stochastic sensing.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA Sensors for the Detection of Mercury Ions.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Pioneering Role of Nanopore Single-Molecule Sensing in Environmental and Food Surveillance.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Probe-assisted detection of FeBiosensors & bioelectronics · 2024Article
- Quantitation of CirculatingACS nano · 2023Article
- Advancements in Nanogels for Enhanced Ocular Drug Delivery: Cutting-Edge Strategies to Overcome Eye Barriers.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A click chemistry amplified nanopore assay for ultrasensitive quantification of HIV-1 p24 antigen in clinical samples.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Probing the Hepatitis B Virus E-Antigen with a Nanopore Sensor Based on Collisional Events Analysis.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Nanopore Technology for the Application of Protein Detection.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Nanopore detection of metal ions: Current status and future directions.Small methods · 2020Article
- Chemically functionalized conical PET nanopore for protein detection at the single-molecule level.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2020Article
- A glass nanopore ionic sensor for surface charge analysis.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Single-molecule Study on the Interactions between Cyclic Nonribosomal Peptides and Protein Nanopore.ACS applied bio materials · 2020Article
- Enzymatic reaction-based nanopore detection of zinc ions.The Analyst · 2019Article
- Nanopore label-free detection of single-nucleotide deletion in Baxα/BaxΔ2.Electrophoresis · 2018Article
- What is the potential of nanolock- and nanocross-nanopore technology in cancer diagnosis?Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2018Review
- Nanolock-Nanopore Facilitated Digital Diagnostics of Cancer Driver Mutation in Tumor Tissue.ACS sensors · 2017Article
- Peptide-Mediated Nanopore Detection of Uranyl Ions in Aqueous Media.ACS sensors · 2017Article
- Label-free nanopore single-molecule measurement of trypsin activity.ACS sensors · 2016Article
- Nanopore back titration analysis of dipicolinic acid.Electrophoresis · 2015Article
- Real-time label-free measurement of HIV-1 protease activity by nanopore analysis.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, DNA-Hg(II) interactions were investigated by monitoring the translocation of DNA hairpins in a protein ion channel in the absence and presence of metal ions. Our experiments demonstrate that target-specific hairpin structures could be stabilized much more significantly by mercuric ions than by the stem length and the loop size of the hairpin due to the formation of Thymine-Hg(II)-Thymine complexes. In addition, the designed DNA probe allows the development of a highly sensitive nanopore sensor for Hg(2+) with a detection limit of 25 nM. Further, the sensor is specific, and other tested metal ions including Pb(2+), Cu(2+), Cd(2+), and so on with concentrations of up to 2 orders of magnitude greater than that of Hg(2+) would not interfere with the mercury detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.