ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2013
Voices to reckon with: perceptions of voice identity in clinical and non-clinical voice hearers.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The "common" experience of voice-hearing and its relationship with shame and guilt: a systematic review.BMC psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- The Phenomenon of "Hearing Voices": Not Just Psychotic Hallucinations-A Psychological Literature Review and a Reflection on Clinical and Social Health.Community mental health journal · 2019Pooled it
- Auditory verbal hallucinations and continuum models of psychosis: A systematic review of the healthy voice-hearer literature.Clinical psychology review · 2017Pooled it
- Reading characters in voices: Ratings of personality characteristics from voices predict proneness to auditory verbal hallucinations.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Speaker effects in language comprehension: An integrative model of language and speaker processing.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Hallucination Proneness Alters Sensory Feedback Processing in Self-voice Production.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Article
- Changes in positive and negative voice content in cognitive-behavioural therapy for distressing voices.Psychology and psychotherapy · 2022Article
- Hypersensitivity to passive voice hearing in hallucination proneness.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- A relationship of sorts: gender and auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.Archives of women's mental health · 2021Article
- Thought Suppression in Primary Psychotic Disorders and Substance/Medication Induced Psychotic Disorder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Development of Voluntary Control Over Voice-Hearing Experiences: Evidence From Treatment-Seeking and Non-Treatment-Seeking Voice-Hearers.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2020Article
- Getting Better Acquainted with Auditory Voice Hallucinations (AVHs): A Need for Clinical and Social Change.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- The Representation of Agents in Auditory Verbal Hallucinations.Mind & language · 2016Article
- Auditory verbal hallucinations: Social, but how?Journal of consciousness studies : controversies in science & the humanities · 2016Article
- Auditory verbal hallucinations in persons with and without a need for care.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2014Review
- A synthesis of evidence on inhibitory control and auditory hallucinations based on the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014Article
- A community of one: social cognition and auditory verbal hallucinations.PLoS biology · 2013Review
- Current perspectives on the mechanisms of auditory hallucinations: introduction to the special research topic.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013Article
- A Neuropsychological Approach to Auditory Verbal Hallucinations and Thought Insertion - Grounded in Normal Voice Perception.Review of philosophy and psychologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current review focuses on the perception of voice identity in clinical and non-clinical voice hearers. Identity perception in auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) is grounded in the mechanisms of human (i.e., real, external) voice perception, and shapes the emotional (distress) and behavioral (help-seeking) response to the experience. Yet, the phenomenological assessment of voice identity is often limited, for example to the gender of the voice, and has failed to take advantage of recent models and evidence on human voice perception. In this paper we aim to synthesize the literature on identity in real and hallucinated voices and begin by providing a comprehensive overview of the features used to judge voice identity in healthy individuals and in people with schizophrenia. The findings suggest some subtle, but possibly systematic biases across different levels of voice identity in clinical hallucinators that are associated with higher levels of distress. Next we provide a critical evaluation of voice processing abilities in clinical and non-clinical voice hearers, including recent data collected in our laboratory. Our studies used diverse methods, assessing recognition and binding of words and voices in memory as well as multidimensional scaling of voice dissimilarity judgments. The findings overall point to significant difficulties recognizing familiar speakers and discriminating between unfamiliar speakers in people with schizophrenia, both with and without AVH. In contrast, these voice processing abilities appear to be generally intact in non-clinical hallucinators. The review highlights some important avenues for future research and treatment of AVH associated with a need for care, and suggests some novel insights into other symptoms of psychosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.