Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23564964›Full record

ArticleComputer physics communications2012

MH

B Hischenhuber, F Frommlet, W Schreiner, B Knapp

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Computer physics communications, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Geometric analysis of alloreactive HLA α-helices.BioMed research international · 2014
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B HischenhuberCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems; Section for Biosimulation and Bioinformatics, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
F Frommlet
W Schreiner
B Knapp

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 22258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major histocompatibility proteins share a common overall structure or peptide binding groove. Two binding groove domains, on the same chain for major histocompatibility class I or on two different chains for major histocompatibility class II, contribute to that structure that consists of two PROGRAM SUMMARY:

Indexed as

AIC, Akaike Information CriterionAkaike Information CriterioncAIC, corrected Akaike Information CriterionCDR, complementarity determining regionConformational changesG, binding grooveHelixIMGT®, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system®MD, Molecular DynamicsMHMH1, major histocompatibility class IMH2c, MH helix curves (name of software)MH2, major histocompatibility class IIMHCMH, major histocompatibilityMinimization and fittingMolecular dynamics simulationPCA, Principal Component AnalysisPC, principal componentPDB, Protein Data Bankp, peptideProteinsSecondary structureStructure and propertiesTheory, modeling, and computer simulationTR, T cell receptorUtilityVMD, Visual Molecular Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID23564964
PMCPMC3617674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.