Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23564842›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013

tmVar: a text mining approach for extracting sequence variants in biomedical literature.

Chih-Hsuan Wei, Bethany R Harris, Hung-Yu Kao, Zhiyong Lu

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Taiyi: a bilingual fine-tuned large language model for diverse biomedical tasks.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Named Entity Recognition and Normalization for Alzheimer's Disease Eligibility Criteria.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. PlagueKD: a knowledge graph-based plague knowledge database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chih-Hsuan WeiNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Bethany R Harris
Hung-Yu Kao
Zhiyong Lu

Funding

Named Entity Recognition and Relationship Extraction in BiomedicineZIALM091813 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LU, ZHIYONG · 2013 to 2022
$13.4M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationText-mining mutation information from the literature becomes a critical part of the bioinformatics approach for the analysis and interpretation of sequence variations in complex diseases in the post-genomic era. It has also been used for assisting the creation of disease-related mutation databases. Most of existing approaches are rule-based and focus on limited types of sequence variations, such as protein point mutations. Thus, extending their extraction scope requires significant manual efforts in examining new instances and developing corresponding rules. As such, new automatic approaches are greatly needed for extracting different kinds of mutations with high accuracy.

resultsHere, we report tmVar, a text-mining approach based on conditional random field (CRF) for extracting a wide range of sequence variants described at protein, DNA and RNA levels according to a standard nomenclature developed by the Human Genome Variation Society. By doing so, we cover several important types of mutations that were not considered in past studies. Using a novel CRF label model and feature set, our method achieves higher performance than a state-of-the-art method on both our corpus (91.4 versus 78.1% in F-measure) and their own gold standard (93.9 versus 89.4% in F-measure). These results suggest that tmVar is a high-performance method for mutation extraction from biomedical literature. AVAILABILITY: tmVar software and its corpus of 500 manually curated abstracts are available for download at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Lu/pub/tmVar

Indexed as

MutationArtificial IntelligenceData MiningDNA Mutational AnalysisHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID23564842
PMCPMC3661051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.