Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23564458›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2013

Exclusive use of trans-editing domains prevents proline mistranslation.

Oscar Vargas-Rodriguez, Karin Musier-Forsyth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Bacterial translation machinery for deliberate mistranslation of the genetic code.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. HumanThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Chiral checkpoints during protein biosynthesis.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oscar Vargas-RodriguezDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210.
Karin Musier-ForsythDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210. Electronic address: musier@chemistry.ohio-state.edu.

Funding

CLASS II AMINOACYL-TRNA SYNTHETASE SUBSTRATE RECOGNITIONR01GM049928 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MUSIER-FORSYTH, KARIN M · 1996 to 2012
$4.0M
CLASS II AMINOACYL-TRNA SYNTHETASE SUBSTRATE RECOGNITIONR29GM049928 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MUSIER-FORSYTH, KARIN M · 1994 to 1996
–
CLASS II AMINOACYL-TRNA SYNTHETASE SUBSTRATE RECOGNITIONR55GM049928 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MUSIER-FORSYTH, KARIN M · 1993 to 1993
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM049928NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) catalyze the attachment of specific amino acids to cognate tRNAs. Although the accuracy of this process is critical for overall translational fidelity, similar sizes of many amino acids provide a challenge to ARSs. For example, prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) mischarge alanine and cysteine onto tRNA(Pro). Many bacterial ProRSs possess an alanine-specific proofreading domain (INS) but lack the capability to edit Cys-tRNA(Pro). Instead, Cys-tRNA(Pro) is cleared by a single-domain homolog of INS, the trans-editing YbaK protein. A global bioinformatics analysis revealed that there are six types of "INS-like" proteins. In addition to INS and YbaK, four additional single-domain homologs are widely distributed throughout bacteria: ProXp-ala (formerly named PrdX), ProXp-x (annotated as ProX), ProXp-y (annotated as YeaK), and ProXp-z (annotated as PA2301). The last three are domains of unknown function. Whereas many bacteria encode a ProRS containing an INS domain in addition to YbaK, many other combinations of INS-like proteins exist throughout the bacterial kingdom. Here, we focus on Caulobacter crescentus, which encodes a ProRS with a truncated INS domain that lacks catalytic activity, as well as YbaK and ProXp-ala. We show that C. crescentus ProRS can readily form Cys- and Ala-tRNA(Pro), and deacylation studies confirmed that these species are cleared by C. crescentus YbaK and ProXp-ala, respectively. Substrate specificity of C. crescentus ProXp-ala is determined, in part, by elements in the acceptor stem of tRNA(Pro) and further ensured through collaboration with elongation factor Tu. These results highlight the diversity of approaches used to prevent proline mistranslation and reveal a novel triple-sieve mechanism of editing that relies exclusively on trans-editing factors.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationRNA EditingAmino Acyl-tRNA SynthetasesCaulobacter crescentusCodonComputational BiologyGenes, BacterialModels, MolecularPhylogenyProlineProtein BiosynthesisProtein Structure, SecondaryRNA, TransferSubstrate SpecificityAmino Acyl-tRNA SynthetasesCodonProlineprolyl T RNA synthetaseRNA, TransferAminoacyl tRNA SynthesisAminoacyl tRNA SynthetasePost-transfer EditingProofreadingTransfer RNA (tRNA)TranslationTranslation Elongation Factors

Identifiers

PMID23564458
PMCPMC3656294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.