Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23564275›Full record

GuidelineInternational journal of legal medicine2013

Malpractice and medical liability. European Guidelines on Methods of Ascertainment and Criteria of Evaluation.

Santo Davide Ferrara, Eric Baccino, Thomas Bajanowski, Rafael Boscolo-Berto, Maria Castellano, Ricardo De Angel, Alvydas Pauliukevičius, Pietrantonio Ricci, Peter Vanezis, Duarte Nuno Vieira and 3 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in International journal of legal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The State-of-the-Art ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Litigation in arthroscopic surgery: a 20-year analysis of legal actions in France.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Santo Davide FerraraInstitute of Legal Medicine, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Via Falloppio 50, 35121 Padova, Italy. santodavide.ferrara@unipd.it
Eric Baccino
Thomas Bajanowski
Rafael Boscolo-Berto
Maria Castellano
Ricardo De Angel
Alvydas Pauliukevičius
Pietrantonio Ricci
Peter Vanezis
Duarte Nuno Vieira
Guido Viel
Enrique Villanueva
EALM Working Group on Medical Malpractice

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manuscript presents the European Guidelines on medico-legal Methods of Ascertainment and Criteria of Evaluation in cases of suspected subjective "Medical Responsibility and/or Liability" developed by an international working group under the patronage of the European Academy of Legal Medicine. It includes a step-by-step illustrated explanation of approved Flow Charts, articulated in 18 sequential steps and comprehensive of both Methods of Ascertainment and Evaluation Criteria.

Indexed as

Liability, LegalAutopsyDocumentationEuropeForensic MedicineHumansMalpracticePhysical Examination

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.