Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23564271›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2014

Transvaginal pure NOTES sigmoid resection using a single port device.

M D'Hondt, D Devriendt, F Van Rooy, F Vansteenkiste, E Dozois

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04048421 (A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Safety of Hybrid Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Treatment of Patients With Colon Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04048421 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Safety of Hybrid Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Treatment of Patients With Colon Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRenmin Hospital of Wuhan UniversityRan2019 to 2025Enrolled55ConditionsColon Cancer, Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic SurgeryArmshvNOTES radical colectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M D'HondtDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Pres. Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium, mathieudhondt2000@yahoo.com.
D Devriendt
F Van Rooy
F Vansteenkiste
E Dozois
AZ Groeninge · BEWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe amount of published experience using natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is increasing. However, approximately half of the technical approaches described include NOTES as part of a hybrid procedure. Colonic resections performed using NOTES have mainly been described using a hybrid approach.

methodsAn 84-year-old female presented with a symptomatic volvulus of the sigmoid colon. Endoscopic detorsion and desufflation were successfully performed. Definitive treatment was accomplished by performing a sigmoid resection entirely via a transvaginal route using a single port device (SILS™ Covidien, Westbury, MA, USA).

resultsOperative time was 135 min. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Only minimal narcotic analgesia was required and oral intake was initiated on postoperative day 3. At the last follow-up assessment, 2 months postoperatively, no complications or recurrent volvulus were observed.

conclusionTransvaginal NOTES sigmoid colectomy for sigmoid volvulus is feasible and can be performed safely.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overColon, SigmoidFemaleHumansIntestinal VolvulusNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryTreatment OutcomeVagina

Identifiers

PMID23564271
OpenAlexW2060127507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.