Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23564270›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2014

Sacral neuromodulation for bowel dysfunction: a consensus statement from the Italian group.

E Falletto, E Ganio, G Naldini, C Ratto, D F Altomare

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Management of obstructed defecation.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence.Gastroenterology report · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Sacral neuromodulation for bowel dysfunction.Techniques in coloproctology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E FallettoDepartment of Surgery, Città della Scienza e della Salute, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Corso Bramante 88, Turin, Italy, ezio.falletto@tin.it.
E Ganio
G Naldini
C Ratto
D F Altomare

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRepresentatives from the Italian centers experienced in sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for the treatment of bowel dysfunction met in order to define the current clinical practice in Italy and to produce a consensus statement regarding indications for this therapy and patient management.

methodsFifty Italian colonproctologists were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning their clinical practice in SNM (290 questions, grouped within 4 broad areas). Physicians expressed their opinion by completing the questionnaire, assigning to each statement their level of agreement according to the 5-point Likert scale; the data were analyzed by attributing to each expert's answers a weight proportional to the degree of experience. During a meeting held 2 months later, the critical aspects of the therapy were re-examined and discussions held with the goal of reaching an agreement on controversial topics. The available literature was reviewed.

resultsPatient selection criteria, etiology, diagnostic investigations, test procedures and implantation, follow-up and evaluation of results have been reviewed. The aim was to achieve an algorithm for patient management, showing the place of SNM in the treatment of bowel dysfunction. The approach in case of treatment failure was also discussed.

conclusionsAnalysis of the data collected reveals substantial consensus at the national level concerning all the main points with regard to the therapy. The recommendations expressed in this article can be considered as national guidelines and taken into account by the principal international implantation centers.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Transcutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationConstipationFecal IncontinenceHumansIntestinal DiseasesItalyLumbosacral PlexusSacrumSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.