Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23564001›Full record

Trial reportSkeletal radiology2013

The Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH): the use of a checklist to evaluate hip fracture healing improves agreement between radiologists and orthopedic surgeons.

Mary M Chiavaras, Simrit Bains, Hema Choudur, Naveen Parasu, Jon Jacobson, Olufemi Ayeni, Brad Petrisor, Rajesh Chakravertty, Sheila Sprague, Mohit Bhandari

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Skeletal radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Romosozumab for the Treatment of Hip Fractures.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Clinical outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures: the influence of fracture pattern and patient specific risk factors.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of osteoporosis and osteoporosis medications on fracture healing: a narrative review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Review
  13. Development of early complications after treatment of trochanteric fractures with an intramedullary sliding hip screw in a geriatric population.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Radiographic Union Score for ulnar fractures (RUSU) predicts ulnar shaft nonunion.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mary M ChiavarasDepartment of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. meg.chiavaras@gmail.com
Simrit Bains
Hema Choudur
Naveen Parasu
Jon Jacobson
Olufemi Ayeni
Brad Petrisor
Rajesh Chakravertty
Sheila Sprague
Mohit Bhandari
McMaster University · CAHamilton General Hospital · CAUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Toronto · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe assessment of fracture healing following intertrochanteric fracture fixation is highly variable with no validated standards. Agreement with respect to fracture healing following surgery is important for optimal patient management. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess reliability of intertrochanteric fracture healing assessment and (2) determine if a novel radiographic scoring system for hip fractures improves agreement between radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. MATERIALS AND

methodsA panel of three radiologists and three orthopedic surgeons assessed fracture healing in 150 cases of intertrochanteric fractures at two separate time points to determine inter-rater and intra-rater agreement. Reviewers, blinded to the time after injury, first subjectively assessed overall healing using frontal and lateral radiographs for each patient at a single time point. Reviewers then scored each fracture using a Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) form to determine whether this improves agreement regarding hip fracture healing.

resultsInter-rater agreement for the overall subjective impression of fracture healing between reviewer groups was only fair (intraclass coefficient [ICC] = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.11-0.52. Use of the RUSH score improved overall agreement between groups to substantial (ICC = 0.66, 95 % CI: 0.53-0.75). Across reviewers, healing of the medial cortex and overall RUSH score itself demonstrated high correlations with overall perceptions of healing (r = 0.53 and r = 0.72, respectively).

conclusionsThe RUSH score improves agreement of fracture healing assessment between orthopedic surgeons and radiologists, offers a systematic approach to evaluating intertrochanteric hip fracture radiographs, and may ultimately provide prognostic information that could predict healing outcomes in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Indexed as

Fracture HealingTrauma Severity IndicesChecklistHip FracturesHumansObserver VariationOntarioOrthopedicsPatient Outcome AssessmentPhysiciansPrevalenceRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySingle-Blind MethodTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23564001
OpenAlexW2090651574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.