Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23562875›Full record

ArticleOstomy/wound management2013

Healthcare providers' perspectives on communicating incontinence and skin damage information with patients with dementia and their family caregivers: a descriptive study.

Sharon Rolnick, Donna Z Bliss, Jody M Jackson, Casey Arntson, Jean Mullins, Kenneth Hepburn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ostomy/wound management, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Barriers to Communication With a Healthcare Provider and Health Literacy About Incontinence Among Informal Caregivers of Individuals With Dementia.Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sharon RolnickHealthPartners Institute of Education and Research, Bloomington, MN, USA. cheri.j.rolnick@healthpartners.com
Donna Z Bliss
Jody M Jackson
Casey Arntson
Jean Mullins
Kenneth Hepburn
HealthPartners · US

Funding

Strengthening Literacy and Dementia Caregiver for Incontinence and Skin DamageR03NR011244 · NINR · HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE · PI ROLNICK, SHARON J · 2008 to 2009
$87k
Raising Literacy and Capacity for Incontinence and Skin Care in DementiaR03NR011243 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLISS, DONNA Z · 2008 to 2009
$60k
NINR NIH HHS R03 NR011243NINR NIH HHS R03 NR011244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication between healthcare providers and patients/family caregivers about incontinence and associated skin damage is wanting, and information about healthcare providers perspectives on improving this communication is limited. A descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured, tape-recorded interviews with 11 healthcare providers with clinical expertise in geriatrics and dementia working in a large integrated healthcare system. The survey was developed by the authors based on a review of the relevant literature with guidance from a three-member Advisory Committee and consisted of nine open-ended questions related to communication with patients and families about incontinence and skin damage. Specifically, information was obtained about providers' perspectives on the timing of inquiring about these problems, how best to tailor language and approach the topic, barriers and facilitators to discussion of incontinence, and recommendations for educational and supportive resources. Responses were analyzed using a content analysis approach. Using a purposeful sampling technique, 11 experienced healthcare professionals agreed to participate in the study. Main themes observed included: 1) incontinence issues are not routinely or voluntarily addressed by all providers, 2) caregivers are receptive to discussion if the topic is broached by patient/caregiver, and 3) main barriers to providing information include limited clinician time and patient/family caregiver embarrassment. Participant clinicians expressed interest in readily available, single-topic, printed patient/caregiver-focused educational materials to enhance patient-provider communication and serve as a resource. These materials were subsequently developed. Further research is warranted to test the effectiveness of the recommendations and the materials developed as a result of the study.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyHealth PersonnelAdultDementiaHumansMiddle AgedSkin DiseasesUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

PMID23562875
PMCPMC5815364
OpenAlexW189351434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.