Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23562140›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2013

Using a sociotechnical framework to understand adaptations in health IT implementation.

Laurie Lovett Novak, Richard J Holden, Shilo H Anders, Jennifer Y Hong, Ben-Tzion Karsh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05493072 (Safety, Performance, and User Perceptions of RxConnect When Used to Provide Patient-specific, Indication Based Prescribing Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05493072 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Safety, Performance, and User Perceptions of RxConnect When Used to Provide Patient-specific, Indication Based Prescribing Support

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2022 to 2023Enrolled24ConditionsBehaviorArmsRxConnect
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Disappearing expertise in clinical automation: Barcode medication administration and nurse autonomy.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laurie Lovett NovakDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Implementation Sciences Laboratory, Center for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: laurie.l.novak@vanderbilt.edu.
Richard J Holden
Shilo H Anders
Jennifer Y Hong
Ben-Tzion Karsh

Funding

Vanderbilt Center for Diabetes Translation ResearchP30DK092986 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ELASY, TOM A · 2011 to 2020
$6.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)KL2TR000446 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
Patient Safety through Implementation Science: Clinical Work Culture & IT DesignR00LM010038 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NOVAK, LAURIE L · 2010 to 2012
$722k
Patient Safety through Implementation Science: Clinical Work Culture & IT DesignK99LM010038 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NOVAK, LAURIE L · 2009 to 2009
$128k
NCATS NIH HHS 2KL2TR000446-06NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000446NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092986NLM NIH HHS 1 K99 LM 010038NLM NIH HHS 4 R00 LM010038NLM NIH HHS K99 LM010038NLM NIH HHS R00 LM010038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhen barcode medication administration (BCMA) is implemented nurses are required to integrate not only a new set of procedures or artifacts into everyday work, but also an orientation to medication safety itself that is sometimes at odds with their own. This paper describes how the nurses' orientation (the Practice Frame) can collide with the orientation that is represented by the technology and its implementation (the System Frame), resulting in adaptations at the individual and organization levels.

methodsThe paper draws on two qualitative research studies that examined the implementation of BCMA in inpatient settings using observation and ethnographic fieldwork, content analysis of email communications, and interviews with healthcare professionals.

resultsTwo frames of reference are described: the System Frame and the Practice Frame. We found collisions of these frames that prompted adaptations at the individual and organization levels. The System Frame was less integrated and flexible than the Practice Frame, less able to account for all of the dimensions of everyday patient care to which medication administration is tied.

conclusionCollisions in frames during implementation of new technology result in adaptations at the individual and organization level that can have a variety of effects. We found adaptations to be a means of evolving both the work routines and the technology. Understanding the frames of clinical workers when new technology is being designed and implemented can inform changes to technology or organizational structure and policy that can preclude unproductive or unsafe adaptations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalElectronic Health RecordsHealth Plan ImplementationHospital Information SystemsHumansMedication Systems, HospitalNursing Staff, HospitalOrganizational InnovationSoftwareTask Performance and AnalysisAdaptationsBarcode medication administrationOrienting framesUnintended consequencesWorkarounds

Identifiers

PMID23562140
PMCPMC3772996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.