ArticleComparative medicine2012
Effects of mobilization regimens in donors on outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation in miniature Swine.
Article in Comparative medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of transplantable B-cell lymphomas in the MHC-defined miniature swine model.Cancer cell international · 2019Article
- Miniature Swine as a Clinically Relevant Model of Graft-Versus-Host Disease.Comparative medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Toxicities and complications associated with hematopoietic cell transplantation currently limit this potentially curative therapy for malignant and nonmalignant blood disorders. Miniature swine provide a clinically relevant model for studies to improve posttransplantation outcomes. Miniature swine recipients of high-dose haploidentical hepatopoietic cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning consisting of low-dose (100 cGy) total-body irradiation, partial T-cell depletion by using a CD3 immunotoxin, and a 45-d course of cyclosporine A typically successfully engraft without graft-versus-host disease. We recently observed broad variability in engraftment outcomes that correlates with the occurrence of adverse reactions in donors after cytokine treatment to mobilize hematopoietic progenitor cells from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood for collection. Haploidentical recipients (n = 16) of cells from donors remaining healthy during cytokine treatment engrafted with multilineage chimerism, did not develop graft-versus-host disease, and did not require any blood products. In comparison, identically conditioned recipients of cells from donors that had severe reactions during cytokine treatment had adverse outcomes, including the development of clinically significant thrombocytopenia requiring blood product support in 8 of 11 swine. Furthermore, all 11 recipients lost peripheral blood myeloid chimerism (indicating lack of engraftment of donor stem cells). These data suggest that posttransplantation complications in swine are influenced by the health status of the donor before and during the collection of hematopoietic cells by leukapheresis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23561882PMC3527753What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.