Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23561784›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2013

Slaying the dragon myth: an ethnographic study of receptionists in UK general practice.

Jonathan Hammond, Katja Gravenhorst, Emma Funnell, Susan Beatty, Derek Hibbert, Jonathan Lamb, Heather Burroughs, Marija Kovandžić, Mark Gabbay, Christopher Dowrick and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Older Patients' Verbal Communication in Interactions With Primary Care Staff: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Education to improve timeliness of shingles diagnosis in primary care: a cluster randomised study within a trial with nested qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolution of the general practice receptionist role and online services: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  13. Role of receptionists in general practice: under-researched and under-valued.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. "Heliyon · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jonathan HammondSchool of Community Based Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. jonathan.hammond@manchester.ac.uk
Katja Gravenhorst
Emma Funnell
Susan Beatty
Derek Hibbert
Jonathan Lamb
Heather Burroughs
Marija Kovandžić
Mark Gabbay
Christopher Dowrick
Linda Gask
Waquas Waheed
Carolyn A Chew-Graham
Primary Health Care · QACzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology · CZKeele University · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practice receptionists fulfil an essential role in UK primary care, shaping patient access to health professionals. They are often portrayed as powerful 'gatekeepers'. Existing literature and management initiatives advocate more training to improve their performance and, consequently, the patient experience.

aimTo explore the complexity of the role of general practice receptionists by considering the wider practice context in which they work. DESIGN AND

settingEthnographic observation in seven urban general practices in the north-west of England.

methodSeven researchers conducted 200 hours of ethnographic observation, predominantly in the reception areas of each practice. Forty-five receptionists were involved in the study and were asked about their work as they carried out their activities. Observational notes were taken. Analysis involved ascribing codes to incidents considered relevant to the role and organising these into related clusters.

resultsReceptionists were faced with the difficult task of prioritising patients, despite having little time, information, and training. They felt responsible for protecting those patients who were most vulnerable, however this was sometimes made difficult by protocols set by the GPs and by patients trying to 'play' the system.

conclusionFraming the receptionist-patient encounter as one between the 'powerful' and the 'vulnerable' gets in the way of fully understanding the complex tasks receptionists perform and the contradictions that are inherent in their role. Calls for more training, without reflective attention to practice dynamics, risk failing to address systemic problems, portraying them instead as individual failings.

Indexed as

Professional RoleAppointments and SchedulesEnglandFamily PracticeGatekeepingHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterprofessional RelationsMedical ReceptionistsOrganizational PolicyProfessional CompetenceProfessional-Patient RelationsUrban Health

Identifiers

PMID23561784
PMCPMC3582976
OpenAlexW2136703505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.