Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23561691›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2013

The challenge of communication in interpreted consultations in diabetes care: a mixed methods study.

Clive Seale, Carol Rivas, Moira Kelly

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The challenge of communication in interpreted consultations in diabetes care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
  10. Training healthcare professionals to work with interpreters.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
  11. Enhancing consultations with interpreters: learning more about how.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clive SealeDepartment of Sociology and Communications, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK. clive.seale@brunel.ac.uk
Carol Rivas
Moira Kelly
Brunel University of London · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0609-10181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe experience of diabetes care for individuals from minority ethnic groups, particularly individuals of Bangladeshi origin, shows they are at a significant disadvantage.

aimTo identify the challenges of interpreted consultations for healthcare providers and to explain the disadvantage experienced by patients from minority groups who have diabetes. DESIGN AND

settingComparison of 12 interpreted consultations with 24 consultations involving fluent English speakers in four primary healthcare centres in Tower Hamlets, east London, UK.

methodContent analysis of video recordings of routine diabetes review consultations in primary care, involving 36 patients, nine nurses or healthcare assistants, and six interpreters.

resultInterpreted consultations were as long as same-language consultations but patients said less. The incidence of misunderstandings was similar but patients in interpreted consultations asked fewer questions. Indicators of social distance in interpreted consultations included less humour and less discussion of the patient's feelings or personal circumstances. Patients in interpreted consultations were less likely to raise issues unrelated to diabetes, to discuss their own ideas about health, or to talk about clinical parameters. Providers commonly addressed English-speaking patients directly but usually addressed patients through interpreters using the third person. Interpreters sometimes changed the meaning or did not translate speech, and they added their own comments.

conclusionThe findings explain some of the known problems of diabetes care for individuals from ethnic minorities. Effective training for interpreters and care providers is needed to reduce social distance and to facilitate patients' involvement in self-management.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersProfessional-Patient RelationsBangladeshComprehensionDiabetes MellitusHumansLanguageLondonPrimary Health CareVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID23561691
PMCPMC3553638
OpenAlexW2094528275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.