Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23561054›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2013

Teaching medical students a clinical approach to altered mental status: simulation enhances traditional curriculum.

Jeremy D Sperling, Sunday Clark, Yoon Kang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03221153 (Simulation for the Evaluation of General Skills in Patient Safety and Quality in Undergraduate Medical Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03221153 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Simulation for the Evaluation of General Skills in Patient Safety and Quality in Undergraduate Medical Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de MontereyRan2016 to 2017Enrolled140ConditionsKnowledge, Attitudes, PracticeArmsSimulation techique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Team-Based Simulation for Medical Student Handoff Education.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeremy D SperlingDivision of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. jes9038@med.cornell.edu
Sunday Clark
Yoon Kang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSimulation-based medical education (SBME) is increasingly being utilized for teaching clinical skills in undergraduate medical education. Studies have evaluated the impact of adding SBME to third- and fourth-year curriculum; however, very little research has assessed its efficacy for teaching clinical skills in pre-clerkship coursework. To measure the impact of a simulation exercise during a pre-clinical curriculum, a simulation session was added to a pre-clerkship course at our medical school where the clinical approach to altered mental status (AMS) is traditionally taught using a lecture and an interactive case-based session in a small group format. The objective was to measure simulation's impact on students' knowledge acquisition, comfort, and perceived competence with regards to the AMS patient.

methodsAMS simulation exercises were added to the lecture and small group case sessions in June 2010 and 2011. Simulation sessions consisted of two clinical cases using a high-fidelity full-body simulator followed by a faculty debriefing after each case. Student participation in a simulation session was voluntary. Students who did and did not participate in a simulation session completed a post-test to assess knowledge and a survey to understand comfort and perceived competence in their approach to AMS.

resultsA total of 154 students completed the post-test and survey and 65 (42%) attended a simulation session. Post-test scores were higher in students who attended a simulation session compared to those who did not (p<0.001). Students who participated in a simulation session were more comfortable in their overall approach to treating AMS patients (p=0.05). They were also more likely to state that they could articulate a differential diagnosis (p=0.03), know what initial diagnostic tests are needed (p=0.01), and understand what interventions are useful in the first few minutes (p=0.003). Students who participated in a simulation session were more likely to find the overall AMS curriculum useful (p<0.001).

conclusionStudents who participated in a simulation exercise performed better on a knowledge-based test and reported increased comfort and perceived competence in their clinical approach to AMS. SBME shows significant promise for teaching clinical skills to medical students during pre-clinical curriculum.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationManikinsStudents, MedicalAdultDiagnosis, DifferentialEducation, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleMental Disordersmental status changepre-clinical medical studentssimulation

Identifiers

PMID23561054
PMCPMC3617787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.