ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
An AUC-based permutation variable importance measure for random forests.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 256 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Predicted Global Redistribution of Pyrophilous BeetleEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Models for Predicting Postoperative Depression Risk in Patients With Ovarian Cancer.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Contrasting foraging strategies of seasonally segregated populations of the band-rumped storm-petrel at St Helena, South Atlantic.Movement ecology · 2026Article
- Pantropical moist forests are converging towards a middle leaf longevity.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Habitat Response Variability: Modeling Predictions Display the Expansion-Contraction Scenario of Two Chinese Endangered Cheirotonus Beetles Under Climate Change.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal Prediction of Ideal Butterfly Habitats in Kun-Ming's Urban Green Areas: Enabled by Maxent and ArcGIS.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Effects of Climate Change on the Global Distribution ofInsects · 2025Article
- Risk prediction of hyperuricemia based on particle swarm fusion machine learning solely dependent on routine blood tests.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Data Augmentation and Machine Learning algorithms for multi-class imbalanced morphometrics data of stingless bees.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Article
- Fidelity to territory and mate and the causes and consequences of breeding dispersal in American goshawk (Astur atricapillus).PloS one · 2025Article
- Performance of Conditional Random Forest and Regression Models at Predicting Human Fecal Contamination of Produce Irrigation Ponds in the Southeastern United States.ACS ES&T water · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of DNA G-quadruplex folding topology with G4ShapePredictor.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting the potential distribution change of the endangered Francois' langur (Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Predicting carob tree physiological parameters under different irrigation systems using Random Forest and Planet satellite images.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Looming-eyes buoys fail to reduce seabird bycatch in the Icelandic lumpfish fishery: depth-based fishing restrictions are an alternative.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Detection of diabetic patients in people with normal fasting glucose using machine learning.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Transcriptome-guided metabolic network analysis reveals rearrangements of carbon flux distribution inmSystems · 2023Article
- Patient and Epidemiological Factors Associated With Influenza Testing in Hospitalized Adults With Acute Respiratory Illnesses, 2016-2017 to 2019-2020.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe random forest (RF) method is a commonly used tool for classification with high dimensional data as well as for ranking candidate predictors based on the so-called random forest variable importance measures (VIMs). However the classification performance of RF is known to be suboptimal in case of strongly unbalanced data, i.e. data where response class sizes differ considerably. Suggestions were made to obtain better classification performance based either on sampling procedures or on cost sensitivity analyses. However to our knowledge the performance of the VIMs has not yet been examined in the case of unbalanced response classes. In this paper we explore the performance of the permutation VIM for unbalanced data settings and introduce an alternative permutation VIM based on the area under the curve (AUC) that is expected to be more robust towards class imbalance.
resultsWe investigated the performance of the standard permutation VIM and of our novel AUC-based permutation VIM for different class imbalance levels using simulated data and real data. The results suggest that the new AUC-based permutation VIM outperforms the standard permutation VIM for unbalanced data settings while both permutation VIMs have equal performance for balanced data settings.
conclusionsThe standard permutation VIM loses its ability to discriminate between associated predictors and predictors not associated with the response for increasing class imbalance. It is outperformed by our new AUC-based permutation VIM for unbalanced data settings, while the performance of both VIMs is very similar in the case of balanced classes. The new AUC-based VIM is implemented in the R package party for the unbiased RF variant based on conditional inference trees. The codes implementing our study are available from the companion website: http://www.ibe.med.uni-muenchen.de/organisation/mitarbeiter/070_drittmittel/janitza/index.html.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.