Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23560583›Full record

ArticleJournal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN2013

Residual newborn screening samples for research: parental information needs for decision-making.

Erin Rothwell, Lauren Clark, Rebecca Anderson, Jeffrey R Botkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erin RothwellCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Lauren Clark
Rebecca Anderson
Jeffrey R Botkin

Funding

Parent Education about Newborn Screening and Bloodspot RetentionR01HG006266 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BOTKIN, JEFFREY R. · 2011 to 2014
$2.1M
Methods for Promoting Public Dialogue on the Use of Residual Newborn Screening SaR01HG004970 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BOTKIN, JEFFREY R. · 2008 to 2010
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004970NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this research was to identify what types of information expectant parents want to make a decision about the use of their babies' residual dried blood specimens for research. DESIGN AND

methodsThree focus groups were conducted with pregnant women and their partners and one focus group with prenatal healthcare providers and educators.

resultsEleven categories of information needs were identified within each focus group. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providing sufficient information for parents to make informed choices will be essential to future research with residual dried blood specimens and to maintain public trust with the growing applications of this important public health program.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDisclosureDried Blood Spot TestingAdultAttitudeBiomedical ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningParental ConsentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23560583
PMCPMC7799500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.