Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23559860›Full record

ReviewMolecular vision2013

Review: Epigenetic mechanisms in ocular disease.

Shikun He, Xiaohua Li, Nymph Chan, David R Hinton

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular vision, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DNA Damage and Repair in Eye Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) in Retinal Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Epigenetics and Signaling Pathways in Glaucoma.BioMed research international · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shikun HeDepartment of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern CA, USA.
Xiaohua Li
Nymph Chan
David R Hinton
University of Southern California · US

Funding

VISION RESEARCHP30EY003040 · NEI · DOHENY EYE INSTITUTE · PI SUN, DEMING · 1985 to 2013
$7.0M
NEI NIH HHS EY03040NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetics has become an increasingly important area of biomedical research. Increasing evidence shows that epigenetic alterations influence common pathologic responses including inflammation, ischemia, neoplasia, aging, and neurodegeneration. Importantly, epigenetic mechanisms may have a pathogenic role in many complex eye diseases such as corneal dystrophy, cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, ocular neoplasia, uveitis, and age-related macular degeneration. The emerging emphasis on epigenetic mechanisms in studies of eye disease may provide new insights into the pathogenesis of complex eye diseases and aid in the development of novel treatments for these diseases.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsEye DiseasesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumans

Identifiers

PMID23559860
PMCPMC3611946
OpenAlexW32331224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.