Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23559519›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2013

Physicochemical regulation of endothelial sprouting in a 3D microfluidic angiogenesis model.

Scott S Verbridge, Anirikh Chakrabarti, Peter DelNero, Brian Kwee, Jeffrey D Varner, Abraham D Stroock, Claudia Fischbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances and challenges in human 3D solid tumor models.Advanced functional materials · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Models for Studying Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Progression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. A Comprehensive Look at In Vitro Angiogenesis Image Analysis Software.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. The Applications and Challenges of the Development ofCellular and molecular bioengineering · 2023
    Review
  7. Selection of natural biomaterials for micro-tissue and organ-on-chip models.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Mechanical regulation of signal transduction in angiogenesis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  11. 3D Bioprinting forBioprinting (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  12. Microfluidic Biomaterials.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Scott S VerbridgeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Anirikh Chakrabarti
Peter DelNero
Brian Kwee
Jeffrey D Varner
Abraham D Stroock
Claudia Fischbach

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143876 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SHULER, MICHAEL L · 2009 to 2014
$12.6M
Microfluidic tumor models to analyze the role of physicochemical cues in the angiRC1CA146065 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI FISCHBACH, CLAUDIA, MITTAL, VIVEK · 2009 to 2010
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS RC1 CA146065NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both physiological and pathological tissue remodeling (e.g., during wound healing and cancer, respectively) require new blood vessel formation via angiogenesis, but the underlying microenvironmental mechanisms remain poorly defined due in part to the lack of biologically relevant in vitro models. Here, we present a biomaterials-based microfluidic 3D platform for analysis of endothelial sprouting in response to morphogen gradients. This system consists of three lithographically defined channels embedded in type I collagen hydrogels. A central channel is coated with endothelial cells, and two parallel side channels serve as a source and a sink for the steady-state generation of biochemical gradients. Gradients of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promoted sprouting, whereby endothelial cell responsiveness was markedly dependent on cell density and vessel geometry regardless of treatment conditions. These results point toward mechanical and/or autocrine mechanisms that may overwhelm pro-angiogenic paracrine signaling under certain conditions. To date, neither geometrical effects nor cell density have been considered critical determinants of angiogenesis in health and disease. This biomimetic vessel platform demonstrated utility for delineating hitherto underappreciated contributors of angiogenesis, and future studies may enable important new mechanistic insights that will inform anti-angiogenic cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Chemical PhenomenaModels, BiologicalNeovascularization, PhysiologicCell CountCell Culture TechniquesEndothelium, VascularHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsMicrofluidicsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AangiogenesiscollagengradientmicrofluidicsVEGF

Identifiers

PMID23559519
PMCPMC3776016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.