Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23559359›Full record

Trial reportHeart and vessels2014

Efficacy and safety of bisoprolol fumarate compared with carvedilol in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure: results of the randomized, controlled, double-blind, Multistep Administration of bisoprolol IN Chronic Heart Failure II (MAIN-CHF II) study.

Masatsugu Hori, Ryozo Nagai, Tohru Izumi, Masunori Matsuzaki

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Heart and vessels, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bisoprolol compared with carvedilol and metoprolol succinate in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Is cardiopulmonary exercise testing essential to indicate ventricular assist device implantation in patients with INTERMACS profile 4-7?Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Lower rotation speed stimulates sympathetic activation during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device treatment.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Preoperative beta-blocker treatment is a key for deciding left ventricular assist device implantation strategy as a bridge to recovery.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Masatsugu HoriOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, 1-3-3 Nakamichi, Higashinari-ku, Osaka, 537-8511, Japan, hori-ma@mc.pref.osaka.jp.
Ryozo Nagai
Tohru Izumi
Masunori Matsuzaki
Kitasato University · JPOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPYamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bisoprolol fumarate (bisoprolol) is a β-blocker widely used to treat chronic heart failure (CHF). However, few studies have compared its efficacy and safety with those of the widely used β-blocker carvedilol in Japanese patients with CHF. We designed a confirmatory trial of bisoprolol using carvedilol as a control drug; however, the trial was discontinued after an off-label use of bisoprolol was approved during the study. Bisoprolol and carvedilol were administered for 32 weeks in 31 and 28 patients, respectively. The mean maintenance doses of bisoprolol and carvedilol were 3.3 and 13.6 mg/day, respectively, and the mean durations of treatment were 188.2 and 172.9 days, respectively. Heart-rate changes were similar in both groups. The mean changes from baseline to Week 32 in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (bisoprolol vs carvedilol groups; 11.7 % ± 8.6 % vs 10.1 % ± 10.5 %), LV end-diastolic volume (-37.5 ± 48.7 vs -24.7 ± 29.4 ml), and LV end-systolic volume (-41.9 ± 43.0 vs -29.3 ± 25.9 ml) revealed a decrease in LV volume and an increase in LVEF in both groups. The cumulative event-free rate for a composite of cardiovascular death or admissions to hospital for worsening of CHF was 92.4 % and 94.7 % in the bisoprolol and carvedilol groups, respectively. Overall, 90.3 % and 85.7 % of patients were titrated up to the maintenance doses of bisoprolol and carvedilol, respectively. Bisoprolol, at half the dose used in other countries, is well tolerated and is as effective as carvedilol for treating Japanese patients with mild to moderate CHF.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedBisoprololCarbazolesCarvedilolChronic DiseaseDisease-Free SurvivalDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleEarly Termination of Clinical TrialsFemaleHeart FailureHeart RateHumansJapanMaleAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsBisoprololCarbazolesCarvedilolPropanolamines

Identifiers

PMID23559359
OpenAlexW1977355272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.