Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23558786›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2013

Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics.

Linas Mazutis, John Gilbert, W Lloyd Ung, David A Weitz, Andrew D Griffiths, John A Heyman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 485 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
485citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

485 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Exploiting Device Deformability for Fluid and Particle Manipulation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

425 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linas MazutisSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS), Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
John Gilbert
W Lloyd Ung
David A Weitz
Andrew D Griffiths
John A Heyman

Funding

Structural basis of the specific protein-protein interactions underlying IF assemP01GM096971 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLDMAN, ROBERT D · 2011 to 2021
$16.8M
Building the Hematopoietic Stem Cell NicheR01EB014703 · NIBIB · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, DAVID J, SCADDEN, DAVID T · 2011 to 2014
$3.1M
Droplet Compartmentalized Selection for Deep-Mining of Antibody DiversityR43AI082861 · NIAID · HABSEL, INC. · PI HEYMAN, JOHN A · 2009 to 2009
$100k
NIAID NIH HHS 1R43AI082861-01NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI082861NIBIB NIH HHS 5R01EB014703-02NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014703NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM096971NIGMS NIH HHS P01GM096971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a droplet-based microfluidics protocol for high-throughput analysis and sorting of single cells. Compartmentalization of single cells in droplets enables the analysis of proteins released from or secreted by cells, thereby overcoming one of the major limitations of traditional flow cytometry and fluorescence-activated cell sorting. As an example of this approach, we detail a binding assay for detecting antibodies secreted from single mouse hybridoma cells. Secreted antibodies are detected after only 15 min by co-compartmentalizing single mouse hybridoma cells, a fluorescent probe and single beads coated with anti-mouse IgG antibodies in 50-pl droplets. The beads capture the secreted antibodies and, when the captured antibodies bind to the probe, the fluorescence becomes localized on the beads, generating a clearly distinguishable fluorescence signal that enables droplet sorting at ∼200 Hz as well as cell enrichment. The microfluidic system described is easily adapted for screening other intracellular, cell-surface or secreted proteins and for quantifying catalytic or regulatory activities. In order to screen ∼1 million cells, the microfluidic operations require 2-6 h; the entire process, including preparation of microfluidic devices and mammalian cells, requires 5-7 d.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesHybridomasMiceMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsSingle-Cell AnalysisAntibodiesFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID23558786
PMCPMC4128248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.