Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23558684›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of biological chemistry2013

Aberrant assembly of RNA recognition motif 1 links to pathogenic conversion of TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43).

Akemi Shodai, Toshifumi Morimura, Akemi Ido, Tsukasa Uchida, Takashi Ayaki, Rina Takahashi, Soichiro Kitazawa, Sakura Suzuki, Mikako Shirouzu, Takanori Kigawa and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. TDP-43: [GU]-ardian of the transcriptome.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Antibody targeting TDP-43 mitigates pathogenic pathways induced by the cerebrospinal fluid of ALS.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Downregulation ofBrain communications · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular Dissection of TDP-43 as a Leading Cause of ALS/FTLD.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Metals in ALS TDP-43 Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Akemi ShodaiMolecular Neuroscience Research Center, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu 520-2192, Japan.
Toshifumi Morimura
Akemi Ido
Tsukasa Uchida
Takashi Ayaki
Rina Takahashi
Soichiro Kitazawa
Sakura Suzuki
Mikako Shirouzu
Takanori Kigawa
Yutaka Muto
Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Ryosuke Takahashi
Ryo Kitahara
Hidefumi Ito
Noriko Fujiwara
Makoto Urushitani
Systems Biology Institute · JPKyoto University · JPShiga University of Medical Science · JPRitsumeikan University · JPHyogo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aggregation of TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43) is a pathological signature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Although accumulating evidence suggests the involvement of RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) in TDP-43 proteinopathy, it remains unclear how native TDP-43 is converted to pathogenic forms. To elucidate the role of homeostasis of RRM1 structure in ALS pathogenesis, conformations of RRM1 under high pressure were monitored by NMR. We first found that RRM1 was prone to aggregation and had three regions showing stable chemical shifts during misfolding. Moreover, mass spectrometric analysis of aggregated RRM1 revealed that one of the regions was located on protease-resistant β-strands containing two cysteines (Cys-173 and Cys-175), indicating that this region served as a core assembly interface in RRM1 aggregation. Although a fraction of RRM1 aggregates comprised disulfide-bonded oligomers, the substitution of cysteine(s) to serine(s) (C/S) resulted in unexpected acceleration of amyloid fibrils of RRM1 and disulfide-independent aggregate formation of full-length TDP-43. Notably, TDP-43 aggregates with RRM1-C/S required the C terminus, and replicated cytopathologies of ALS, including mislocalization, impaired RNA splicing, ubiquitination, phosphorylation, and motor neuron toxicity. Furthermore, RRM1-C/S accentuated inclusions of familial ALS-linked TDP-43 mutants in the C terminus. The relevance of RRM1-C/S-induced TDP-43 aggregates in ALS pathogenesis was verified by immunolabeling of inclusions of ALS patients and cultured cells overexpressing the RRM1-C/S TDP-43 with antibody targeting misfolding-relevant regions. Our results indicate that cysteines in RRM1 crucially govern the conformation of TDP-43, and aberrant self-assembly of RRM1 at amyloidogenic regions contributes to pathogenic conversion of TDP-43 in ALS.

Indexed as

AmyloidAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisIntranuclear Inclusion BodiesNeuronsProtein FoldingAmino Acid MotifsDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleProtein Structure, QuaternaryProtein Structure, TertiaryRNA SplicingUbiquitinationAmyloidDNA-Binding ProteinsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's Disease)Cell BiologyProtein Chemical ModificationProtein MisfoldingStructural BiologyTAR DNA-binding Protein 43 kDa

Identifiers

PMID23558684
PMCPMC3663511
OpenAlexW2043042906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.