ReviewMycorrhiza2013
An evidence-based consensus for the classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota).
Review in Mycorrhiza, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
140 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 671 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of the Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Root-Lesion Nematodes,Frontiers in plant science · 2020Pooled it
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alters stomatal conductance of host plants more under drought than under amply watered conditions: a meta-analysis.Mycorrhiza · 2015Pooled it
- The 3D genome of Gigaspora margarita unveils stable chromatin and nucleolar organization and symbiont-dependent genome dynamics.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Influence of plant cover on the long-term dynamics of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal SynCom in a semi-arid Mediterranean environment.Mycorrhiza · 2026Article
- Fungal highways to water: Mechanisms of drought tolerance in arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal symbioses.Mycorrhiza · 2026Review
- Article
- Molecular markers for the study of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modulate the adaptation of aeluropus lagopoides in hypersaline environments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Belowground-Aboveground climate allies: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as ecosystem bridges for greenhouse gas mitigation.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- High-Resolution Community Profiling of Active Bacteria and Eukaryotes in Replant-Diseased Blueberry Farm Soils From New Jersey, USA.Environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Spores of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inhabiting the insides of mossballs formed bymicroPublication biology · 2026Article
- Harnessing rhizosphere microbes: the synergistic roles of PGPR and AMF in sustainable tomato production under stress.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Interactive effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic amendments on maize growth under salinity stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Seasonal variation and drought effects on colonization and community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes in desert plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A new genus (MycoKeys · 2026Article
- Transcriptome Analysis of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Using Short-Read Sequencing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Native Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities in Trap Cultures Are Shaped by Traditional Host Plants and Agricultural Soils.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Drought Intensity Shapes Soil Legacy Effects on Grassland Plant and Soil Microbial Communities and Their Responses to Future Drought.Global change biology · 2025Article
- Impact of Farming System on Soil Microbial Communities Associated with Common Bean in a Region of Northern Spain.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The publication of a large number of taxon names at all levels within the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota) has resulted in conflicting systematic schemes and generated considerable confusion among biologists working with these important plant symbionts. A group of biologists with more than a century of collective experience in the systematics of Glomeromycota examined all available molecular-phylogenetic evidence within the framework of phylogenetic hypotheses, incorporating morphological characters when they were congruent. This study is the outcome, wherein the classification of Glomeromycota is revised by rejecting some new names on the grounds that they are founded in error and by synonymizing others that, while validly published, are not evidence-based. The proposed "consensus" will provide a framework for additional original research aimed at clarifying the evolutionary history of this important group of symbiotic fungi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.