ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2013
Assessment of S values in stylized and voxel-based rat models for positron-emitting radionuclides.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dose predictions for [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2021Article
- Assessment of radiation dose in nuclear cardiovascular imaging using realistic computational models.Medical physics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePositron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful tool in small animal research, enabling noninvasive quantitative imaging of biochemical processes in living subjects. However, the dosimetric characteristics of small animal PET imaging are usually overlooked, although the radiation dose may be significant. The variations of anatomical characteristics between the various computational models may result in differences in the dosimetric outcome.
methodsWe used five different anatomical rat models (two stylized and three voxel based) to compare calculated absorbed fractions and S values for eight positron-emitting radionuclides (C-11, N-13, O-15, F-18, Cu-64, Ga-68, Y-86, and I-124) commonly used to label various probes for small animal PET imaging. The MCNPX radiation transport code was used for radiation dose calculations.
resultsFor most source/target organ pairs, O-15 and Ga-68 produce the highest self-absorbed S values because of the high-energy and high-frequency of positron emissions, while Y-86 produces the highest cross-absorbed S values because of the high energy and high frequency of γ-rays emission. Anatomical models produced from different rat strains or modeling techniques exhibit different organ masses, volumes, and thus give rise to different S values and absorbed dose. The variations of absorbed fractions between models of the same type are less than those between models with different types. The calculated S values depend strongly on organ mass, and as such, different models produce similar S values for organs of comparable masses. In most source organs presenting with high cumulated activity, the absorbed dose is less affected by model difference compared with other organs.
conclusionsThe produced S values for common positron-emitting radionuclides can be exploited in the assessment of radiation dose to rats from different radiotracers used in small animal PET experiments. This work contributes to a better understanding of the influence of different computational models on small animal dosimetry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.