Illustrated review of the embryology and development of the facial region, part 3: an overview of the molecular interactions responsible for facial development.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Infected type 1 congenital upper lip sinus in 8 years child: A rare case report.Radiology case reports · 2025
   Article
2. The Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Developmental Midline Nasal Masses: Histopathological, Clinical, and Radiological Aspects.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Review
3. Decoding the Human Face: Progress and Challenges in Understanding the Genetics of Craniofacial Morphology.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022
   Review
4. Ciliary Hedgehog signaling regulates cell survival to build the facial midline.eLife · 2021
   Article
5. Insights into the genetic architecture of the human face.Nature genetics · 2021
   Article
6. Mandible exosomal ssc-mir-133b regulates tooth development in miniature swine via endogenous apoptosis.Bone research · 2018
   Article
7. CT and MRI of congenital nasal lesions in syndromic conditions.Pediatric radiology · 2015
   Review
8. Comparative effects of neonatal diethylstilbestrol on external genitalia development in adult males of two mouse strains with differential estrogen sensitivity.Differentiation; research in biological diversity
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as