ArticleGeneral hospital psychiatry
Depression care and treatment in a chronically ill Medicare population.
Article in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- German general practitioners' self-reported management of patients with chronic depression.BMC psychiatry · 2017Article
- Identification and treatment of depression of older adults in primary care: findings from the São Paulo Ageing and Health Study.Family practice · 2016Article
- Article
- Association of organizational culture and climate with variation in the clinical outcomes of collaborative care for maternal depression in community health centers.Implementation research and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to examine depression care among chronically ill Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.
methodsThis study includes 5898 Medicare Advantage members with a depression diagnosis enrolled between 2008 and 2010 in a care management program. Two depression care indicators were created: (a) any depression care (≥ 1 antidepressant prescription or ≥ 1 specialty mental health visit) and (b) among those receiving any depression care, those receiving an antidepressant prescription for ≥ 90 days or ≥ 2 specialty visits. Multivariable analysis using logistic regression was used to examine correlates of depression care.
resultsAmong those <65 years old, 72% received any depression care with 75% receiving ≥ 90 days of an antidepressant and/or ≥ 2 specialty visits. Among ≥ 65 years old, 65% received any depression care with 67% receiving ≥ 90 days of an antidepressant and/or ≥ 2 specialty visits. For both age groups, female gender, medical comorbidities and dual eligibility were positively associated with an antidepressant prescription. In the older group, female gender was positively associated with at least a 90-day supply of an antidepressant prescription, while substance use disorders were negatively associated with receiving a minimum of 90 days of an antidepressant. Regional differences and certain psychiatric comorbidities were also associated with receiving depression care.
conclusionTwo thirds of the depressed patients in this Medicare Advantage population received depression care. Further studies are needed to examine the effects of quality improvement efforts in the context of care management programs for chronically ill older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.