ArticleBMC family practice2013
Patient and physician related factors of adherence to evidence based guidelines in diabetes mellitus type 2, cardiovascular disease and prevention: a cross sectional study.
Article in BMC family practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quality indicators for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Results from the "Me & My Heart" (eMocial) Study: a Randomized Evaluation of a New Smartphone-Based Support Tool to Increase Therapy Adherence of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2023Trial
- Cluster randomised trial on the effectiveness of a computerised prompt to refer (back) patients with type 2 diabetes.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Effectiveness of improvement plans in primary care practice accreditation: a clustered randomized trial.PloS one · 2014Trial
- Clinical inertia in cardiovascular risk management: prevalence, associated factors, and impact on outcomes of the OPM study.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Guideline adherence for the management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: a scoping review.Family practice · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Saudi physicians toward the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a nationwide cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Effects of task-shifting from primary care physicians to nurses: an overview of systematic reviews.Human resources for health · 2024Review
- Phenotyping Adherence Through Technology-Enabled Reports and Navigation (the PATTERN Study): Qualitative Study for Intervention Adaptation Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment Framework.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Nationwide survey of physicians' familiarity and awareness of diabetes guidelines in China: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Clinician challenges to evidence-based prescribing for heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: A qualitative evaluation.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2023Article
- A machine learning evaluation of patient characteristics associated with prescribing of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- The approach of Iranian clinical pharmacists in the treatment of dyslipidemia based on international guidelines.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2023Article
- Article
- Doctors' adherence to guidelines recommendations and glycaemic control in diabetic patients in Quetta, Pakistan: Findings from an observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Expert-based medication reviews to reduce polypharmacy in older patients in primary care: a northern-Italian cluster-randomised controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2021Review
- Differences in Hospitalization Outcomes of Kidney Disease between Patients Who Received Care by Nephrologists and Non-Nephrologist Physicians: A Propensity-Score-Matched Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- The Effect of Javanese Language Videos with a Community Based Interactive Approach Method as an Educational Instrument for Knowledge, Perception, and Adherence amongst Tuberculosis Patients.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Adherence to the National Guidelines for Follow-Up Protocol in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Greece: The GLANCE Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients do not always receive guideline-adherent therapy, yet little is known about the underlying causes on the patients' side. We quantified non-guideline-adherent treatment of chronic diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation) in primary care and analysed the causes from the physician's as well as the patient's view.
methodsWith the intention to analyze the frequency and causes of non-guideline-adherent treatment of patients with chronic diseases, we drew a random sample of 124 general practitioners (GP) in Salzburg, Austria, of which 58 (46.8%) participated. In the participating GP surgeries, we consecutively recruited 501 patients with at least one of the target-diseases and checked the guideline conformity of treatment using 9 quality indicators. We then interviewed the patients as well as the general practitioners regarding factors affecting deviation from guideline recommendations.
resultsOf the 501 patients, a total of 1224 quality indicators could be analysed. Non-adherence to guideline recommendations were present in 16.8% (n = 205, 95% CI 14.7 to 18.8%) of all quality indicators. In 61.5% of these cases (n = 126, 95% CI 53.0 to 70.0%) the treatment was wrongly judged as not recommended by the physicians. In 10.2% (n = 21, 95% CI 0 to 23.2%) physicians attributed non-adherence to patient's non-compliance, and in 10.7% (n = 22, 95% CI 0 to 23.7%) to an adverse drug event, whereas only 5.4% (n = 11, 95% CI 0 to 18.7%) of non-adherence was related to an adverse drug event reported by the patients. Patients were unaware regarding the reason for non-adherent therapy in 64.4% (n = 132, 95% CI 56.2 to 72.6%) of the quality indicators. In 20.0% (n = 41, 95% CI 7.8 to 32.2%) patients regarded a drug as not needed.
conclusionsGuideline adherence in chronic care was relatively good in our study sample, but still leaving room for improvement. Physicians' lack of knowledge and patients' lack of awareness account for about 70% of non-adherence, indicating the necessity to improve physician education, and patient involvement. In about 30% of the quality indicators not fulfilled, non-adherence is due to other reasons like adverse drug events or patients not willing to take a recommended drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.