Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23557331›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2013

Text-messaging versus telephone reminders to reduce missed appointments in an academic primary care clinic: a randomized controlled trial.

Noelle Junod Perron, Melissa Dominicé Dao, Nadia Camparini Righini, Jean-Paul Humair, Barbara Broers, Françoise Narring, Dagmar M Haller, Jean-Michel Gaspoz

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02970201 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Improving Adherence in Renal Dialysis Patients; a Randomized Crossover Trial for an Electronic Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2015 to 2016Enrolled26ConditionsEndstage Renal DiseaseArmsEpxDialysis
NCT03002311 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Improving Medical Care With Electronic Interventions Based on Automated Text and Phone Messages

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2016 to 2018Enrolled327ConditionsGeneral Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Mobile HealthArmsEpharmix/CareSignal eHealth
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Noelle Junod PerronDivision of primary care medicine, Department of community medicine, primary care and emergency medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 4 rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva 14, 1211, Switzerland. noelle.junod@hcuge.ch
Melissa Dominicé Dao
Nadia Camparini Righini
Jean-Paul Humair
Barbara Broers
Françoise Narring
Dagmar M Haller
Jean-Michel Gaspoz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelephone or text-message reminders have been shown to significantly reduce the rate of missed appointments in different medical settings. Since text-messaging is less resource-demanding, we tested the hypothesis that text-message reminders would be as effective as telephone reminders in an academic primary care clinic.

methodsA randomized controlled non-inferiority trial was conducted in the academic primary care division of the Geneva University Hospitals between November 2010 and April 2011. Patients registered for an appointment at the clinic, and for whom a cell phone number was available, were randomly selected to receive a text-message or a telephone call reminder 24 hours before the planned appointment. Patients were included each time they had an appointment. The main outcome was the rate of unexplained missed appointments. Appointments were not missed if they were cancelled or re-scheduled before or independently from the intervention. We defined non-inferiority as a difference below 2% in the rate of missed appointments and powered the study accordingly. A satisfaction survey was conducted among a random sample of 900 patients (response rate 41%).

results6450 patients were included, 3285 in the text-message group and 3165 in the telephone group. The rate of missed appointments was similar in the text-message group (11.7%, 95% CI: 10.6-12.8) and in the telephone group (10.2%, 95% CI: 9.2-11.3 p = 0.07). However, only text message reminders were cost-effective. No patient reported any disturbance by any type of reminder in the satisfaction survey. Three quarters of surveyed patients recommended its regular implementation in the clinic.

conclusionsText-message reminders are equivalent to telephone reminders in reducing the proportion of missed appointments in an academic primary care clinic and are more cost-effective. Both types of reminders are well accepted by patients.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAppointments and SchedulesOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPatient CompliancePrimary Health CareTelephoneText MessagingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionReminder SystemsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID23557331
PMCPMC3623700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.