Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23557279›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2013

Implications in the difference of anti-Mi-2 and -p155/140 autoantibody prevalence in two dermatomyositis cohorts from Mexico City and Guadalajara.

Marcelo H Petri, Minoru Satoh, Beatriz T Martin-Marquez, Raul Vargas-Ramírez, Luis J Jara, Miguel A Saavedra, Claudia Cruz-Gonzalez, Lilia Andrade-Ortega, Olga Vera-Lastra, Mario Salazar-Páramo and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Myositis-specific Antibodies: Overview and Clinical Utilization.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dermatomyositis autoantibodies: how can we maximize utility?Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Classical Dermatomyositis: A Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Bench to bedside review of myositis autoantibodies.Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcelo H Petri
Minoru Satoh
Beatriz T Martin-Marquez
Raul Vargas-Ramírez
Luis J Jara
Miguel A Saavedra
Claudia Cruz-Gonzalez
Lilia Andrade-Ortega
Olga Vera-Lastra
Mario Salazar-Páramo
Rosa E Prieto-Parra
Laura Gonzalez-Lopez
Jorge I Gamez-Nava
Hermes U Ramírez-Sánchez
Jason Y F Chan
Steven J Ross
Edward K L Chan
Mónica Vázquez-Del Mercado
Universidad de Guadalajara · MXCentro Médico Nacional La Raza · MXUniversity of Florida · USFlorida College · USHospital Civil de Guadalajara · MXHospital de Especialidades · MXInstitute for Social Security and Services for State Workers · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAutoantibodies and clinical manifestations in polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) are affected by both genetic and environmental factors. The high prevalence of DM and anti-Mi-2 in Central America is thought to be associated with the high UV index of the area. The prevalences of autoantibodies and the clinical manifestations of PM/DM were evaluated comparing two cohorts in Mexico.

methodsNinety-five Mexican patients with PM/DM (66 DM, 29 PM; 67 Mexico City, 28 Guadalajara) were studied. Autoantibodies were characterized by immunoprecipitation using 35S-methionine labeled K562 cell extract. Clinical information was obtained from medical records.

resultsDM represented 69% of PM/DM and anti-Mi-2 was the most common autoantibody (35%), followed by anti-p155/140 (11%); however, anti-Jo-1 was only 4%. The autoantibody profile in adult-onset DM in Mexico City versus Guadalajara showed striking differences: anti-Mi-2 was 59% versus 12% (P = 0.0012) whereas anti-p155/140 was 9% versus 35% (P = 0.02), respectively. A strong association of anti-Mi-2 with DM was confirmed and when clinical features of anti-Mi-2 (+) DM (n = 30) versus anti-Mi-2 (-) DM (n = 36) were compared, the shawl sign (86% versus 64%, P < 0.05) was more common in the anti-Mi-2 (+) group (P = 0.0001). Levels of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) were higher in those who were anti-Mi-2 (+) but they responded well to therapy.

conclusionsAnti-Mi-2 has a high prevalence in Mexican DM and is associated with the shawl sign and high CPK. The prevalence of anti-Mi-2 and anti-p155/140 was significantly different in Mexico City versus Guadalajara, which have a similar UV index. This suggests roles of factors other than UV in anti-Mi-2 antibody production.

Indexed as

AdultAutoantibodiesAutoantigensDermatomyositisFemaleHumansImmunoprecipitationMaleMexicoMi-2 Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase ComplexMiddle AgedPrevalenceAutoantibodiesAutoantigensCHD4 protein, humanMi-2 antibodiesMi-2 Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase Complexp140 autoantigen, human

Identifiers

PMID23557279
PMCPMC4060281
OpenAlexW2125979230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.