Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23556928›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2013

Out-of-atlas likelihood estimation using multi-atlas segmentation.

Andrew J Asman, Lola B Chambless, Reid C Thompson, Bennett A Landman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontal lobe metabolic alterations characterizing Parkinson's disease cognitive impairment.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew J AsmanElectrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA. andrew.j.asman@vanderbilt.edu
Lola B Chambless
Reid C Thompson
Bennett A Landman
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

An Interactive Web-Based Game for Collaborative Labeling of Medical ImagesR21NS064534 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, JERRY L · 2009 to 2010
$436k
Resource Development for the Java Image Science ToolkitR03EB012461 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2010 to 2010
$147k
NIBIB NIH HHS 1R03EB012461NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB012461NINDS NIH HHS 1R21NS064534NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS064534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMulti-atlas segmentation has been shown to be highly robust and accurate across an extraordinary range of potential applications. However, it is limited to the segmentation of structures that are anatomically consistent across a large population of potential target subjects (i.e., multi-atlas segmentation is limited to "in-atlas" applications). Herein, the authors propose a technique to determine the likelihood that a multi-atlas segmentation estimate is representative of the problem at hand, and, therefore, identify anomalous regions that are not well represented within the atlases.

methodsThe authors derive a technique to estimate the out-of-atlas (OOA) likelihood for every voxel in the target image. These estimated likelihoods can be used to determine and localize the probability of an abnormality being present on the target image.

resultsUsing a collection of manually labeled whole-brain datasets, the authors demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework on two distinct applications. First, the authors demonstrate the ability to accurately and robustly detect malignant gliomas in the human brain-an aggressive class of central nervous system neoplasms. Second, the authors demonstrate how this OOA likelihood estimation process can be used within a quality control context for diffusion tensor imaging datasets to detect large-scale imaging artifacts (e.g., aliasing and image shading).

conclusionsThe proposed OOA likelihood estimation framework shows great promise for robust and rapid identification of brain abnormalities and imaging artifacts using only weak dependencies on anomaly morphometry and appearance. The authors envision that this approach would allow for application-specific algorithms to focus directly on regions of high OOA likelihood, which would (1) reduce the need for human intervention, and (2) reduce the propensity for false positives. Using the dual perspective, this technique would allow for algorithms to focus on regions of normal anatomy to ascertain image quality and adapt to image appearance characteristics.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSubtraction TechniqueBrainData Interpretation, StatisticalDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLikelihood FunctionsPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID23556928
PMCPMC3625241
OpenAlexW2048515486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.