Trial reportBMC pharmacology & toxicology2013
Scottish and Newcastle antiemetic pre-treatment for paracetamol poisoning study (SNAP).
Trial report in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- A metabolomic analysis of thiol response for standard and modified N-acetyl cysteine treatment regimens in patients with acetaminophen overdose.Clinical and translational science · 2021Trial
- In vitro Study of the Effects of Acetylcysteine on the International Normalized Ratio Over Time.Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2026Article
- The emerging role of alternatively activated macrophages to treat acute liver injury.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- Intravenous Acetylcysteine: What Should Replace the Prescott "Three-Bag" Protocol?Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2024Article
- Practice Patterns for N-acetylcysteine Dosing for Acetaminophen Toxicity in the United States.Innovations in pharmacy · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the Association between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of Metabolizing Enzymes with the Serum Concentration of Paracetamol and Its Metabolites.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Acetylcysteine in paracetamol poisoning: a perspective of 45 years of use.Toxicology research · 2019Review
- An evaluation of the role of mixing techniques in the observed variation in acetylcysteine infusion concentrations.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Article
- A comment on 'An assessment of the variation in the concentrations of acetylcysteine in infusions for the treatment of paracetamol overdose'.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Circulating acetaminophen metabolites are toxicokinetic biomarkers of acute liver injury.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2017Article
- Evidence for the changing regimens of acetylcysteine.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Review
- Comprehensive microRNA profiling in acetaminophen toxicity identifies novel circulating biomarkers for human liver and kidney injury.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Paracetamol poisoning: beyond the nomogram.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Review
- Impact of amending the acetylcysteine marketing authorisation on treatment of paracetamol overdose.ISRN toxicology · 2013Article
- Safety and Efficacy of the SNAP 12-hour Acetylcysteine Regimen for the Treatment of Paracetamol Overdose.EClinicalMedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundParacetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning remains the commonest cause of acute liver injury in Europe and North America. The intravenous (IV) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) regimen introduced in the 1970s has continued effectively unchanged. This involves 3 different infusion regimens (dose and time) lasting over 20 hours. The same weight-related dose of NAC is used irrespective of paracetamol dose. Complications include frequent nausea and vomiting, anaphylactoid reactions and dosing errors. We designed a randomised controlled study investigating the efficacy of antiemetic pre-treatment (ondansetron) using standard NAC and a modified, shorter, regimen. METHODS/
designWe designed a double-blind trial using a 2 × 2 factorial design involving four parallel groups. Pre-treatment with ondansetron 4 mg IV was compared against placebo on nausea and vomiting following the standard (20.25 h) regimen, or a novel 12 h NAC regimen in paracetamol poisoning. Each delivered 300 mg/kg bodyweight NAC. Randomisation was stratified on: paracetamol dose, perceived risk factors, and time to presentation. The primary outcome was the incidence of nausea and vomiting following NAC. In addition the frequency of anaphylactoid reactions and end of treatment liver function documented. Where clinically necessary further doses of NAC were administered as per standard UK protocols at the end of the first antidote course. DISCUSSION: This study is primarily designed to test the efficacy of prophylactic anti-emetic therapy with ondansetron, but is the first attempt to formally examine new methods of administering IV NAC in paracetamol overdose. We anticipate, from volunteer studies, that nausea and vomiting will be less frequent with the new NAC regimen. In addition as anaphylactoid response appears related to plasma concentrations of both NAC and paracetamol anaphylactoid reactions should be less likely. This study is not powered to assess the relative efficacy of the two NAC regimens, however it will give useful information to power future studies. As the first formal randomised clinical trial in this patient group in over 30 years this study will also provide information to support further studies in patients in paracetamol overdose, particularly, when linked with modern novel biomarkers of liver damage, patients at different toxicity risk.
trial registrationEudraCT number 2009-017800-10, ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT01050270.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.