Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23556536›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2013

How many signal peptides are there in bacteria?

Dmitry N Ivankov, Samuel H Payne, Michael Y Galperin, Stefano Bonissone, Pavel A Pevzner, Dmitrij Frishman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. SignalP: The Evolution of a Web Server.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The human transmembrane proteome.Biology direct · 2015
    Article
  13. Proteogenomic analysis and global discovery of posttranslational modifications in prokaryotes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dmitry N IvankovTechnische Universität München, Department of Genome-Oriented Bioinformatics, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Samuel H Payne
Michael Y Galperin
Stefano Bonissone
Pavel A Pevzner
Dmitrij Frishman

Funding

Comparative Analysis Of Completely Sequenced GenomesZIALM000073 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 2009 to 2025
$43.1M
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COMPLETELY SEQUENCED GENOMESZ01LM000073 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 1996 to 2008
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 LM000073Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HL999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 5 years proteogenomics (using mass spectroscopy to identify proteins predicted from genomic sequences) has emerged as a promising approach to the high-throughput identification of protein N-termini, which remains a problem in genome annotation. Comparison of the experimentally determined N-termini with those predicted by sequence analysis tools allows identification of the signal peptides and therefore conclusions on the cytoplasmic or extracytoplasmic (periplasmic or extracellular) localization of the respective proteins. We present here the results of a proteogenomic study of the signal peptides in Escherichia coli K-12 and compare its results with the available experimental data and predictions by such software tools as SignalP and Phobius. A single proteogenomics experiment recovered more than a third of all signal peptides that had been experimentally determined during the past three decades and confirmed at least 31 additional signal peptides, mostly in the known exported proteins, which had been previously predicted but not validated. The filtering of putative signal peptides for the peptide length and the presence of an eight-residue hydrophobic patch and a typical signal peptidase cleavage site proved sufficient to eliminate the false-positive hits. Surprisingly, the results of this proteogenomics study, as well as a re-analysis of the E. coli genome with the latest version of SignalP program, show that the fraction of proteins containing signal peptides is only about 10%, or half of previous estimates.

Indexed as

Protein Sorting SignalsProteomeBase SequenceEscherichia coli K12Mass SpectrometryMembrane ProteinsPeptide MappingPeptidesProteinsSequence AnalysisSerine EndopeptidasesSoftwareMembrane ProteinsPeptidesProteinsProtein Sorting SignalsProteomeSerine Endopeptidasestype I signal peptidase

Identifiers

PMID23556536
PMCPMC3621014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.