Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23556473›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2013

Identification of vancomycin-resistant enterococci clones and inter-hospital spread during an outbreak in Taiwan.

Sai-Cheong Lee, Mi-Si Wu, Hsiang-Ju Shih, Shu-Huan Huang, Meng-Jiun Chiou, Lai-Chu See, Liang-Kee Siu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Non-Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  3. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Article
  6. Investigation of vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium outbreak in neonatal intensive care unit.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sai-Cheong LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Chang Gung University, 222, Mai Chin Road, Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan. Lee.sch@msa.hinet.net
Mi-Si Wu
Hsiang-Ju Shih
Shu-Huan Huang
Meng-Jiun Chiou
Lai-Chu See
Liang-Kee Siu
Chang Gung University · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWKeelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWNational Health Research Institutes · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2003, nosocomial infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) occurred rarely in Taiwan. Between 2003 and 2010, however, the average prevalence of vancomycin resistance among enterococci spp. increased from 2% to 16% in community hospitals and from 3% to 21% in medical centers of Taiwan. We used molecular methods to investigate the epidemiology of VRE in a tertiary teaching hospital in Taiwan.

methodsBetween February 2009 and February 2011, rectal samples and infection site specimens were collected from all inpatients in the nephrology ward after patient consent was obtained. VRE strain types were determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST).

resultsA total of 59 vanA gene-containing VRE isolates (1 per patient) were obtained; 24 originated from rectal sample surveillance of patients who exhibited no symptoms (22 Enterococcus faecium and 2 Enterococcus faecalis), and 35 had developed infections over 3 days after admission (32 E. faecium, 2 E. faecalis, and 1 Enterococcus durans). The 59 VRE isolates demonstrated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ≥256 μg/m. The MIC range for linezolid, tigecycline, and daptomycin was 0.25-1.5 μg/mL, 0.032-0.25 and 1-4 μg/mL, respectively. For 56 isolates, the MIC for teicoplanin was >8 μg/mL. The predominant types in the nephrology ward were MLST types 414, 78, and18 as well as PFGE types A, C, and D.

conclusionVREs are endemic in nephrology wards. MLST 414 is the most predominant strain. The increase VRE prevalence is due to cross-transmission of VRE clones ST 414,78,18 by undetected VRE carriers. Because similar VRE STs had been reported in a different hospital of Taiwan, this finding may indicate inter-hospital VRE spread in Taiwan. Active surveillance and effective infection control policies are important controlling the spread of VRE in high risk hospital zones. All endemic VRE strains are resistant to teicoplanin but are sensitive to daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksVancomycin ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCarbon-Oxygen LigasesCross InfectionElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEndemic DiseasesEnterococcusFemaleGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHospitals, TeachingHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular EpidemiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCarbon-Oxygen LigasesVanA ligase, BacteriaVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID23556473
PMCPMC3623712
OpenAlexW2004098808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.