ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2012
New treatments in hemophilia: insights for the clinician.
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Results of a phase I/II open-label, safety and efficacy trial of coagulation factor IX (recombinant), albumin fusion protein in haemophilia B patients.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2015Trial
- Impact of being underweight or overweight on factor VIII dosing in hemophilia A patients.Haematologica · 2013Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Etranacogene Dezaparvovec Versus Extended Half-Life Prophylaxis for Moderate-to-Severe Haemophilia B in Germany.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2024Review
- Intraosseous delivery of platelet-targeted factor VIII lentiviral vector in humanized NBSGW mice.Blood advances · 2022Article
- How to Manage a Patient with Haemophilia and ACS Requiring PCI: A Battle between Bleeding and Thrombosis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Novel therapies and current clinical progress in hemophilia A.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2018Review
- Alloantibodies to therapeutic factor VIII in hemophilia A: the role of von Willebrand factor in regulating factor VIII immunogenicity.Haematologica · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemophilia has evolved from an often fatal hereditary bleeding disorder to a disorder for which safe and effective treatment is available. However, there are several challenges remaining in the treatment of hemophilia. Prophylaxis to prevent bleeding is costly and requires frequent intravenous injections, which are cumbersome for patients. Venous access is often difficult to achieve, especially in small children where central venous lines may need to be implanted. Development of inhibitory antibodies makes treatment of acute bleeds difficult and prophylaxis in patients with inhibitors must also be better addressed. In order to improve treatment, new products are being developed, some of which are already in clinical trials. There are several approaches to prolonging half-lives such as PEGylation, Fc fusion and albumin fusion. Increased activity has been demonstrated in preclinical trials for factor IX and in a human trial with factor VII where the activity of the molecules has been increased by manipulation of the molecular composition. Additional approaches, including blockage of inhibitors of clotting, are also under investigation. Factor VIII and factor IX gene therapy have become a tangible possibility since phase I data recently have been published. Results are promising and there is hope that in the near future substantial progress will be made, perhaps making hemophilia the first genetic condition to be cured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.