ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2011
Experimental approaches in the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-Multiple Myeloma Potential of Secondary Metabolites fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Multiple Myeloma: Treatment is Getting Individualized.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myeloma therapy has undergone significant advances in recent years resulting in a marked improvement in survival. Knowledge of the active pathways involved in myeloma pathogenesis has led to the discovery of novel agents and greatly expanded the potential armamentarium available for treatment. This better understanding of the disease and resistance mechanisms has resulted in new agent classes that are being evaluated in preclinical and early clinical studies. In addition, dosing for existing agents is being optimized, and they are being given in new combinations. In this article, we review experimental agents that are showing promise in multiple myeloma treatment. New biological agents in clinical trials hold the promise of efficacy through novel mechanisms of action, with a significant reduction of dose-limiting toxicities compared with classic cytotoxic chemotherapeutics. Second-generation proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents are furthest along in clinical development, and histone deacetylase inhibitors, heat shock protein 90 inhibitors, Akt inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies are some of the other agents entering later-phase clinical trials. We also review developments in targeting the myeloma stem cell as an exciting new treatment direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.