ArticlePloS one2013
Critical transitions in early embryonic aortic arch patterning and hemodynamics.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isolated Coarctation of the Aorta: Current Concepts and Perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Longitudinal Live Imaging-Derived 4D Hemodynamics and Dynamic Tissue Mechanics Across Outflow Tract Morphogenesis.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Double vertebral artery-connected persisting proatlantal artery coexisting with a persisting carotid duct in an adult case: first evidence.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
- A Parametric Finite Element Analysis of Chick Embryo Aortic Valve Leaflet Biomechanics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Origins of Aortic Coarctation: A Vascular Smooth Muscle Compartment Boundary Model.Journal of developmental biology · 2025Article
- Modulation of mechanosensitive genes during embryonic aortic arch development.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2025Article
- Congenital heart defects differ following left versus right avian cardiac neural crest ablation.Developmental biology · 2025Article
- Unique Subclavian Vascular Ring Anomaly: Insights from CT Angiography.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An anatomically informed computational fluid dynamics modeling approach for quantifying hemodynamics in the developing heart.PloS one · 2025Article
- Adaptive Growth of the Ductus Arteriosus and Aortic Isthmus in Various Ductus-Dependent Complex Congenital Heart Diseases.Pediatric cardiology · 2024Article
- Hemodynamics During Development and Postnatal Life.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Identifying critical transitions in complex diseases.Journal of biosciences · 2022Review
- Assessing Early Cardiac Outflow Tract Adaptive Responses Through Combined Experimental-Computational Manipulations.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- Haemodynamic dependence of mechano-genetic evolution of the cardiovascular system in Japanese medaka.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Cardiac Neural Crest Cells: Their Rhombomeric Specification, Migration, and Association with Heart and Great Vessel Anomalies.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2021Review
- Embryonic Mouse Cardiodynamic OCT Imaging.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2020Review
- Validating the Paradigm That Biomechanical Forces Regulate Embryonic Cardiovascular Morphogenesis and Are Fundamental in the Etiology of Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2020Review
- Follow Me! A Tale of Avian Heart Development with Comparisons to Mammal Heart Development.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2020Review
- Phenotypic Switching Resulting From Developmental Plasticity: Fixed or Reversible?Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- Asymmetry in Mechanosensitive Gene Expression during Aortic Arch Morphogenesis.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transformation from the bilaterally symmetric embryonic aortic arches to the mature great vessels is a complex morphogenetic process, requiring both vasculogenic and angiogenic mechanisms. Early aortic arch development occurs simultaneously with rapid changes in pulsatile blood flow, ventricular function, and downstream impedance in both invertebrate and vertebrate species. These dynamic biomechanical environmental landscapes provide critical epigenetic cues for vascular growth and remodeling. In our previous work, we examined hemodynamic loading and aortic arch growth in the chick embryo at Hamburger-Hamilton stages 18 and 24. We provided the first quantitative correlation between wall shear stress (WSS) and aortic arch diameter in the developing embryo, and observed that these two stages contained different aortic arch patterns with no inter-embryo variation. In the present study, we investigate these biomechanical events in the intermediate stage 21 to determine insights into this critical transition. We performed fluorescent dye microinjections to identify aortic arch patterns and measured diameters using both injection recordings and high-resolution optical coherence tomography. Flow and WSS were quantified with 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Dye injections revealed that the transition in aortic arch pattern is not a uniform process and multiple configurations were documented at stage 21. CFD analysis showed that WSS is substantially elevated compared to both the previous (stage 18) and subsequent (stage 24) developmental time-points. These results demonstrate that acute increases in WSS are followed by a period of vascular remodeling to restore normative hemodynamic loading. Fluctuations in blood flow are one possible mechanism that impacts the timing of events such as aortic arch regression and generation, leading to the variable configurations at stage 21. Aortic arch variations noted during normal rapid vascular remodeling at stage 21 identify a temporal window of increased vulnerability to aberrant aortic arch morphogenesis with the potential for profound effects on subsequent cardiovascular morphogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.