ArticlePloS one2013
Evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite distribution in plants: insight from the comparison of sequenced brassica, Arabidopsis and other angiosperm species.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-Wide Development and Characterization of 169 gSSR Markers in the Invasive PlantPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genome-wide microsatellite characterization and their marker development and transferability in Broussonetia Species.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genome-wide development of SSR molecular markers for modern sugarcane cultivars.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of microsatellite distribution in the genomes of Pteropus vampyrus and Miniopterus natalensis (Chiroptera).BMC genomic data · 2023Article
- Development and utility of SSR markers based onFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genome-Wide Survey and Development of the First Microsatellite Markers Database (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Genome-wide analyses reveal footprints of divergent selection and popping-related traits in CIMMYT's maize inbred lines.Journal of experimental botany · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Characterization and Validation of Chromosome-Specific Highly Polymorphic SSR Markers From Pomegranate (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- An extended KASP-SNP resource for molecular breeding in Chinese cabbage(Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis).PloS one · 2020Article
- Comparative genome-wide characterization leading to simple sequence repeat marker development for Nicotiana.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Genomic and transcriptomic sequencing of Rosa hybrida provides microsatellite markers for breeding, flower trait improvement and taxonomy studies.BMC plant biology · 2018Article
- Comprehensive Characterization of Simple Sequence Repeats in Eggplant (Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Molecular Cytogenetics ofBioMed research international · 2018Article
- Putative Microsatellite DNA Marker-Based Wheat Genomic Resource for Varietal Improvement and Management.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- A comparative genomics approach revealed evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite imperfection and conservation in genusHereditas · 2017Article
- Genome microsatellite diversity within the Apicomplexa phylum.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2016Article
- Genome-wide characterization of microsatellites in Triticeae species: abundance, distribution and evolution.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Cytogenetic Diversity of Simple Sequences Repeats in Morphotypes of Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- A Genome-Wide Survey of the Microsatellite Content of the Globe Artichoke Genome and the Development of a Web-Based Database.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite their ubiquity and functional importance, microsatellites have been largely ignored in comparative genomics, mostly due to the lack of genomic information. In the current study, microsatellite distribution was characterized and compared in the whole genomes and both the coding and non-coding DNA sequences of the sequenced Brassica, Arabidopsis and other angiosperm species to investigate their evolutionary dynamics in plants. The variation in the microsatellite frequencies of these angiosperm species was much smaller than those for their microsatellite numbers and genome sizes, suggesting that microsatellite frequency may be relatively stable in plants. The microsatellite frequencies of these angiosperm species were significantly negatively correlated with both their genome sizes and transposable elements contents. The pattern of microsatellite distribution may differ according to the different genomic regions (such as coding and non-coding sequences). The observed differences in many important microsatellite characteristics (especially the distribution with respect to motif length, type and repeat number) of these angiosperm species were generally accordant with their phylogenetic distance, which suggested that the evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite distribution may be generally consistent with plant divergence/evolution. Importantly, by comparing these microsatellite characteristics (especially the distribution with respect to motif type) the angiosperm species (aside from a few species) all clustered into two obviously different groups that were largely represented by monocots and dicots, suggesting a complex and generally dichotomous evolutionary pattern of microsatellite distribution in angiosperms. Polyploidy may lead to a slight increase in microsatellite frequency in the coding sequences and a significant decrease in microsatellite frequency in the whole genome/non-coding sequences, but have little effect on the microsatellite distribution with respect to motif length, type and repeat number. Interestingly, several microsatellite characteristics seemed to be constant in plant evolution, which can be well explained by the general biological rules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.