ArticlePloS one2013
The geometry of locomotive behavioral states in C. elegans.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking brain and behavior states in Zebrafish Larvae locomotion using hidden Markov models.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- AAnet Resolves a Continuum of Spatially Localized Cell States to Unveil Intratumoral Heterogeneity.Cancer discovery · 2025Article
- Chronic pain is linked to a resting-state neural archetype that optimizes learning from punishments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Pathogen infection induces sickness behaviors through neuromodulators linked to stress and satiety in C. elegans.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Markovian dynamics forProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Caenorhabditis elegans foraging patterns follow a simple rule of thumb.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Non-Stationary Dynamic Mode Decomposition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Multisite regulation integrates multimodal context in sensory circuits to control persistent behavioral states in C. elegans.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Non-Stationary Dynamic Mode Decomposition.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2023Article
- Stearoyl-CoA desaturases sustain cholinergic excitation and copulatory robustness in metabolically agingiScience · 2022Article
- Visual exploration dynamics are low-dimensional and driven by intrinsic factors.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Regulation of Satiety Quiescence by Neuropeptide Signaling inFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Behavioral States.Genetics · 2020Review
- Whole-organism behavioral profiling reveals a role for dopamine in state-dependent motor program coupling ineLife · 2020Article
- Bioelectronics for Millimeter-Sized Model Organisms.iScience · 2020Review
- Article
- Nonlinear Control in the NematodeFrontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
- Identity domains capture individual differences from across the behavioral repertoire.Nature neuroscience · 2019Article
- Computational geometric tools for quantitative comparison of locomotory behavior.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We develop a new hidden Markov model-based method to analyze C elegans locomotive behavior and use this method to quantitatively characterize behavioral states. In agreement with previous work, we find states corresponding to roaming, dwelling, and quiescence. However, we also find evidence for a continuum of intermediate states. We suggest that roaming, dwelling, and quiescence may best be thought of as extremes which, mixed in any proportion, define the locomotive repertoire of C elegans foraging and feeding behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.