Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23555282›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

Fine characterisation of a recombination hotspot at the DPY19L2 locus and resolution of the paradoxical excess of duplications over deletions in the general population.

Charles Coutton, Farid Abada, Thomas Karaouzene, Damien Sanlaville, Véronique Satre, Joël Lunardi, Pierre-Simon Jouk, Christophe Arnoult, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg, Pierre F Ray

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02872948 (Diagnosis Accuracy of Noninvasive Screening by PCR Digital for Down Syndrom), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02872948 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Diagnosis Accuracy of Noninvasive Screening by PCR Digital for Down Syndrom

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2015 to 2017Enrolled1,260ConditionsTrisomy 21ArmsDiagnostic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Deletion of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Charles CouttonEquipe Génétique, Infertilité et Thérapeutiques, Laboratoire AGIM, CNRS FRE3405, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France.
Farid Abada
Thomas Karaouzene
Damien Sanlaville
Véronique Satre
Joël Lunardi
Pierre-Simon Jouk
Christophe Arnoult
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Pierre F Ray
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRUniversité Joseph Fourier · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDépartement de Chimie Moléculaire · FRHôpital Couple Enfant · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We demonstrated previously that 75% of infertile men with round, acrosomeless spermatozoa (globozoospermia) had a homozygous 200-Kb deletion removing the totality of DPY19L2. We showed that this deletion occurred by Non-Allelic Homologous Recombination (NAHR) between two homologous 28-Kb Low Copy Repeats (LCRs) located on each side of the gene. The accepted NAHR model predicts that inter-chromatid and inter-chromosome NAHR create a deleted and a duplicated recombined allele, while intra-chromatid events only generate deletions. Therefore more deletions are expected to be produced de novo. Surprisingly, array CGH data show that, in the general population, DPY19L2 duplicated alleles are approximately three times as frequent as deleted alleles. In order to shed light on this paradox, we developed a sperm-based assay to measure the de novo rates of deletions and duplications at this locus. As predicted by the NAHR model, we identified an excess of de novo deletions over duplications. We calculated that the excess of de novo deletion was compensated by evolutionary loss, whereas duplications, not subjected to selection, increased gradually. Purifying selection against sterile, homozygous deleted men may be sufficient for this compensation, but heterozygously deleted men might also suffer a small fitness penalty. The recombined alleles were sequenced to pinpoint the localisation of the breakpoints. We analysed a total of 15 homozygous deleted patients and 17 heterozygous individuals carrying either a deletion (n = 4) or a duplication (n = 13). All but two alleles fell within a 1.2-Kb region central to the 28-Kb LCR, indicating that >90% of the NAHR took place in that region. We showed that a PRDM9 13-mer recognition sequence is located right in the centre of that region. Our results therefore strengthen the link between this consensus sequence and the occurrence of NAHR.

Indexed as

AllelesChromatidsGene DuplicationGenetics, PopulationHeterozygoteHomologous RecombinationHumansInfertility, MaleMaleMembrane ProteinsSequence DeletionSpermatozoaDPY19L2 protein, humanMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23555282
PMCPMC3605140
OpenAlexW2074174087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.