Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23554481›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Toward high performance, weakly invasive brain computer interfaces using selective visual attention.

David Rotermund, Udo A Ernst, Sunita Mandon, Katja Taylor, Yulia Smiyukha, Andreas K Kreiter, Klaus R Pawelzik

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. On variability in local field potentials.Communications biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Attention Selectively Gates Afferent Signal Transmission to Area V4.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David RotermundInstitute for Theoretical Physics and Institute for Brain Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany. davrot@neuro.uni-bremen.de
Udo A Ernst
Sunita Mandon
Katja Taylor
Yulia Smiyukha
Andreas K Kreiter
Klaus R Pawelzik
University of Bremen · DEInstituto de Física Teórica · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces have been proposed as a solution for paralyzed persons to communicate and interact with their environment. However, the neural signals used for controlling such prostheses are often noisy and unreliable, resulting in a low performance of real-world applications. Here we propose neural signatures of selective visual attention in epidural recordings as a fast, reliable, and high-performance control signal for brain prostheses. We recorded epidural field potentials with chronically implanted electrode arrays from two macaque monkeys engaged in a shape-tracking task. For single trials, we classified the direction of attention to one of two visual stimuli based on spectral amplitude, coherence, and phase difference in time windows fixed relative to stimulus onset. Classification performances reached up to 99.9%, and the information about attentional states could be transferred at rates exceeding 580 bits/min. Good classification can already be achieved in time windows as short as 200 ms. The classification performance changed dynamically over the trial and modulated with the task's varying demands for attention. For all three signal features, the information about the direction of attention was contained in the γ-band. The most informative feature was spectral amplitude. Together, these findings establish a novel paradigm for constructing brain prostheses as, for example, virtual spelling boards, promising a major gain in performance and robustness for human brain-computer interfaces.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesAnimalsAttentionBrainDiscrimination, PsychologicalElectrodes, ImplantedElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsMacaca mulattaMalePhotic StimulationReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID23554481
PMCPMC6618919
OpenAlexW2138708458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.