Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23554205›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Microbiological diagnosis of severe diarrhea in kidney transplant recipients by use of multiplex PCR assays.

Jean-François Coste, Vincent Vuiblet, Betoul Moustapha, Alexis Bouin, Sylvie Lavaud, Olivier Toupance, Alexis de Rougemont, Lucie Benejat, Francis Megraud, Aurore Wolak-Thierry and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diagnostical Performances of the FilmArray Gastro-Intestinal Panel in Kidney Transplant Recipients.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Epidemiology and outcomes of medically attended and microbiologically confirmed bacterial foodborne infections in solid organ transplant recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Diarrhea in kidney transplant recipients: Etiology and outcome.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. RecurringIDCases · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Rationale of using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels for etiological diagnosis of infective diarrhea in the tropics.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-François CosteClinical and Molecular Virology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and EA-4684 Cardiovir SFR-CAP sante, Reims, France.
Vincent Vuiblet
Betoul Moustapha
Alexis Bouin
Sylvie Lavaud
Olivier Toupance
Alexis de Rougemont
Lucie Benejat
Francis Megraud
Aurore Wolak-Thierry
Isabelle Villena
Cathy Chemla
Elisabeth Le Magrex
Christophe de Champs
Laurent Andreoletti
Philippe Rieu
Nicolas Leveque
Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diarrhea is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation, ascribed to adverse effects of the immunosuppressive therapy in case of negative microbiological examination of the stools. The aim of this study was to improve the microbiological diagnosis by implementing molecular tests. Fifty-four severe diarrhea events that occurred in 49 adult kidney transplant recipients from September 2010 to November 2011 were investigated. One or several enteric pathogens were detected in 13 (23%) stool samples using classical microbiological methods versus 39 (72%) for the seven commercially available multiplex PCR assays used retrospectively (P = 0.006). Interestingly, molecular diagnosis identified 15 multiple infections compared to none using classical techniques. The primary pathogens detected were enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) (n = 15; 38%), Campylobacter spp. (n = 15; 38%), and Norovirus (n = 14; 36%). Specificities for Campylobacter and Norovirus infection diagnosis were 75 and 100%, respectively, by comparison to reference methods. Based on molecular findings, a cyclosporine-mycophenolate mofetil combination was identified as a risk factor for developing Norovirus-induced diarrhea. Norovirus infections were also responsible for higher weight loss than all the other causes of diarrhea. In samples from asymptomatic immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients, EPEC but not Norovirus and Campylobacter infections were detected at a frequency similar to that observed in symptomatic kidney transplant recipients. In conclusion, molecular tools significantly improved the detection of single and multiple enteric infections by comparison to classical techniques and could quickly become the key element in the management of severe acute diarrhea in transplant recipients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBacterial InfectionsCoinfectionDiarrheaFecesFemaleHumansImmunocompromised HostKidney TransplantationMaleMicrobiological TechniquesMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMolecular Sequence Data

Identifiers

PMID23554205
PMCPMC3716061
OpenAlexW2035388691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.