ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
Mobile digital fluorescence microscopy for diagnosis of tuberculosis.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-assisted cervical cytology precancerous screening for high-risk population in resource-limited regions using a compact microscope.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Inorganic Complexes and Metal-Based Nanomaterials for Infectious Disease Diagnostics.Chemical reviews · 2019Review
- Smartphone-based clinical diagnostics: towards democratization of evidence-based health care.Journal of internal medicine · 2019Review
- Nuclear morphometrics and chromatin condensation patterns as disease biomarkers using a mobile microscope.PloS one · 2019Article
- Identification of pathogenic bacteria in complex samples using a smartphone based fluorescence microscope.RSC advances · 2018Article
- Design and clinical validation of a point-of-care device for the diagnosis of lymphoma via contrast-enhanced microholography and machine learning.Nature biomedical engineering · 2018Article
- Computer Vision Malaria Diagnostic Systems-Progress and Prospects.Frontiers in public health · 2017Review
- Review of Telemicrobiology.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2016Review
- A Review of Automatic Methods Based on Image Processing Techniques for Tuberculosis Detection from Microscopic Sputum Smear Images.Journal of medical systems · 2016Review
- Article
- A lateral electrophoretic flow diagnostic assay.Lab on a chip · 2015Article
- Biomedical imaging and sensing using flatbed scanners.Lab on a chip · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Access to sputum smear microscopy in high-tuberculosis (TB)-burden regions is limited by a scarcity of microscopes and experienced technicians. We evaluated the accuracy of CellScope, a novel digital fluorescence microscope that may expand access to microscopy. The study utilized smear microscopy slides prepared from sputum specimens submitted by consecutive adults with ≥ 2 weeks of cough who were admitted to Mulago Hospital (Kampala, Uganda). Conventional light-emitting diode (LED) fluorescence microscopy (FM) and mycobacterial culture were performed by experienced technicians. Two U.S.-based postgraduate researchers without prior microscopy experience restained, imaged, and interpreted the slides using CellScope. We assessed whether sensitivity and specificity of CellScope-based LED FM was noninferior to conventional LED FM by using a preselected margin of inferiority of 15%. Of 525 patients included, 72% were HIV seropositive and 39% had culture-confirmed TB. The proportions of positive results were similar with CellScope and conventional LED FM (34% versus 32%, respectively; P = 0.32), and agreement was substantial. CellScope accuracy was within the noninferiority margin for both sensitivity (63% versus 70%; difference, -7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13% to -1%) and specificity (85% versus 92%; difference, -7%; 95% CI, -12% to -3%). A subanalysis of 43 slides evaluated by each CellScope reader found substantial interreader reliability (custom-weighted kappa, 0.65) and variable intrareader reliability (custom-weighted kappa, 0.11 versus 0.48). CellScope offers promise for expanding microscopy services. Future studies should evaluate the device when operated by health workers in low-resource settings, the feasibility of image transmission and analysis by experienced microscopists, and the accuracy of automated image analysis algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.